Antenatal risk prediction of shoulder dystocia: influence of diabetes and obesity: a multicenter study
- PMID: 34389888
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06041-7
Antenatal risk prediction of shoulder dystocia: influence of diabetes and obesity: a multicenter study
Abstract
Purpose: To estimate the risk of shoulder dystocia (SD) in pregnancies with/without maternal diabetes or obesity; to identify antenatal maternal and fetal ultrasound-derived risk factors and calculate their contributions.
Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis of 13,428 deliveries in three tertiary hospitals (2014-2017) with fetal ultrasound data ≤ 14 days prior to delivery (n = 7396).
Inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancies in women ≥ 18 years old; vertex presentation; vaginal delivery at ≥ 37 weeks of gestation. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) and birth weight (BW) were categorized by steps of 250 g. To evaluate risk factors, a model was performed using ultrasound data with SD as the dependent variable.
Results: Diabetes was present in 9.3%; BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 in 10.4% and excessive weight gain in 39.8%. The total SD rate was 0.9%, with diabetes 2.0% and with obesity 1.9%. These increased with BW 4250-4499 g compared to 4000-4249 g in women with diabetes (12.1% vs 1.9%, P = 0.010) and without (6.1% vs 1.6%, P < 0.001) and at the same BW threshold for women with obesity (9.6% vs 0.6%, P = 0.002) or without (6.4% vs 1.8%, P < 0.001). Rates increased similarly for EFW at 4250 g and for AC-HC at 2.5 cm. Independent risk factors for SD were EFW ≥ 4250 g (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.5-9.4), AC-HC ≥ 2.5 cm (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.3-7.5) and diabetes (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.0). HC/AC ratio, obesity, excessive weight gain and labor induction were not significant.
Conclusion: Independent of diabetes, which remains a risk factor for SD, a significant increase may be expected if the EFW is ≥ 4250 g and AC-HC is ≥ 2.5 cm.
Keywords: Abdominal–head circumference; Birth weight; Diabetes; Estimated fetal weight; Obesity; Shoulder dystocia.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Ouzounian JG, Lerner H, Gonik B, Goodwin TM (2006) Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(3):657–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.09.007 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Overland EA, Vatten LJ, Eskild A (2014) Pregnancy week at delivery and the risk of shoulder dystocia: a population study of 2,014,956 deliveries. Br Int J Obstet Gynaecol (BJOG) 121(1):34–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12427 - DOI
-
- Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics (2017) Practice bulletin no 178: shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 129(5):e123–e133. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002043 - DOI
-
- Michelotti F, Flatley C, Kumar S (2018) Impact of shoulder dystocia, stratified by type of manoeuvre, on severe neonatal outcome and maternal morbidity. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 58(3):298–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12718 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Tsur A, Sergienko R, Wiznitzer A, Zlotnik A, Sheiner E (2012) Critical analysis of risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(5):1225–1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2139-8 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical