Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Nov;304(5):1169-1177.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06041-7. Epub 2021 Aug 13.

Antenatal risk prediction of shoulder dystocia: influence of diabetes and obesity: a multicenter study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Antenatal risk prediction of shoulder dystocia: influence of diabetes and obesity: a multicenter study

Julia Vetterlein et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the risk of shoulder dystocia (SD) in pregnancies with/without maternal diabetes or obesity; to identify antenatal maternal and fetal ultrasound-derived risk factors and calculate their contributions.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis of 13,428 deliveries in three tertiary hospitals (2014-2017) with fetal ultrasound data ≤ 14 days prior to delivery (n = 7396).

Inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancies in women ≥ 18 years old; vertex presentation; vaginal delivery at ≥ 37 weeks of gestation. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) and birth weight (BW) were categorized by steps of 250 g. To evaluate risk factors, a model was performed using ultrasound data with SD as the dependent variable.

Results: Diabetes was present in 9.3%; BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 in 10.4% and excessive weight gain in 39.8%. The total SD rate was 0.9%, with diabetes 2.0% and with obesity 1.9%. These increased with BW 4250-4499 g compared to 4000-4249 g in women with diabetes (12.1% vs 1.9%, P = 0.010) and without (6.1% vs 1.6%, P < 0.001) and at the same BW threshold for women with obesity (9.6% vs 0.6%, P = 0.002) or without (6.4% vs 1.8%, P < 0.001). Rates increased similarly for EFW at 4250 g and for AC-HC at 2.5 cm. Independent risk factors for SD were EFW ≥ 4250 g (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.5-9.4), AC-HC ≥ 2.5 cm (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.3-7.5) and diabetes (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.2-4.0). HC/AC ratio, obesity, excessive weight gain and labor induction were not significant.

Conclusion: Independent of diabetes, which remains a risk factor for SD, a significant increase may be expected if the EFW is ≥ 4250 g and AC-HC is ≥ 2.5 cm.

Keywords: Abdominal–head circumference; Birth weight; Diabetes; Estimated fetal weight; Obesity; Shoulder dystocia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Ouzounian JG, Lerner H, Gonik B, Goodwin TM (2006) Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(3):657–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.09.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Overland EA, Vatten LJ, Eskild A (2014) Pregnancy week at delivery and the risk of shoulder dystocia: a population study of 2,014,956 deliveries. Br Int J Obstet Gynaecol (BJOG) 121(1):34–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12427 - DOI
    1. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics (2017) Practice bulletin no 178: shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol 129(5):e123–e133. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002043 - DOI
    1. Michelotti F, Flatley C, Kumar S (2018) Impact of shoulder dystocia, stratified by type of manoeuvre, on severe neonatal outcome and maternal morbidity. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 58(3):298–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12718 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsur A, Sergienko R, Wiznitzer A, Zlotnik A, Sheiner E (2012) Critical analysis of risk factors for shoulder dystocia. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(5):1225–1229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2139-8 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources