Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;25(1):217-228.
doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01543-y. Epub 2021 Aug 14.

Who is there? Captive western gorillas distinguish human voices based on familiarity and nature of previous interactions

Affiliations

Who is there? Captive western gorillas distinguish human voices based on familiarity and nature of previous interactions

Roberta Salmi et al. Anim Cogn. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

The ability to recognize conspecifics by their acoustic signals is of crucial importance to social animals, especially where visibility is limited, because it allows for discrimination between familiar and unfamiliar individuals and facilitates associations with and the avoidance of particular conspecifics. Animals may also benefit from an ability to recognize and use the information coded into the auditory signals of other species. Companion species such as dogs, cats, and horses are able to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar human voices; however, whether this ability is widespread across vertebrates is still unknown. Using playback experiments, we tested whether western gorillas living at Zoo Atlanta were able to discriminate between the voices of subgroups of people: i.e., unfamiliar individuals, familiar individuals with whom the gorillas had positive interactions, and familiar individuals with whom they had negative interactions. Gorillas responded significantly more often (longer gazing duration, higher gazing frequency, shorter latency, and larger number of distress behaviors) to the voices of unfamiliar and familiar-negative individuals than to those of familiar-positive individuals, indicating that they recognized the voices of subgroup of people based on familiarity and possibly the nature of the relationship with them. Future studies should determine whether this is also the case in the wild, where interspecific associations with humans are less intense than they are in captive settings.

Keywords: Ape communication; Gorilla gorilla; Heterospecific eavesdropping; Heterospecific vocal recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adachi I, Kuwahata H, Fujita K (2007) Dogs recall their owner’s face upon hearing the owner’s voice. Anim Cogn 10:17–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0025-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bakeman R (2005) Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behav Res Methods 37:379–384 - DOI
    1. Bates LA, Sayialel KN, Njiraini NW, Moss CJ, Poole JH, Byrne RW (2007) Elephants classify human ethnic groups by odor and garment color. Curr Biol 17:1938–1942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.060 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boinski S, Campbell AF (1996) The huh vocalization of white-faced capuchins: a spacing call disguised as a food call? Ethology 102:826–840 - DOI
    1. Bouchet H, Pellier AS, Blois-Heulin C, Lemasson A (2010) Sex differences in the vocal repertoire of adult red-capped mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus): a multi-level acoustic analysis. Am J Primatol 72:360–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20791 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources