Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep:142:104930.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104930. Epub 2021 Jul 25.

Performance of six rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection and implications for practical use

Affiliations

Performance of six rapid diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection and implications for practical use

Slim Fourati et al. J Clin Virol. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins in nasopharyngeal swabs using lateral flow immunoassays is a simple, fast and cheap approach to diagnose the infection.

Aims and methods: The performance of 6 SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic tests has been assessed in 634 hospitalized patients or outpatients including 297 patients found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by means of RT-PCR and 337 patients presumed to be SARS-CoV-2 RNA-negative.

Results: The specificity of SARS-CoV-2 RDTs was generally high (398.5%). One assay had a lower specificity of 93.2%. The overall sensitivity of the 6 RDTs was variable, from 32.3% to 61.7%. Sensitivity correlated with the delay of sampling after the onset of symptoms and the viral load estimated by the Ct value in RT-PCR. Four out of 6 RDTs tested achieved sensitivities 380% when clinical specimens were collected during the first 3 days following symptom onset or with a Ct value ≤25.

Conclusions: The present study shows that SARS-CoV-2 antigen can be easily and reliably detected by RDTs. These tests are easy and rapid to perform. However, the specificity and sensitivity of COVID-19 antigen RDTs may widely vary across different tests and must therefore be carefully evaluated before releasing these assays for realworld applications.

Keywords: Antigen assay; COVID-19; Diagnostic; Rapid diagnostic test; SARS-CoV-2; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. JAMA. 2020;324:782–793. - PubMed
    1. Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M, Molenkamp R, Meijer A, Chu DK, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill. 2020:25. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Visseaux B, Le Hingrat Q, Collin G, Ferre V, Storto A, Ichou H, et al. Evaluation of the RealStar(R) SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR kit RUO performances and limit of detection. J. Clin. Virol. 2020;129 - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China Diagnosis and treatment protocol for novel coronavirus pneumonia (trial version 7) Chin. Med. J. 2020;133(9):1087–1095. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation . 2020. Clininical Management of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI) when COVID-19 Disease is Suspected.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-clinical-2021-1 Available at.

LinkOut - more resources