(Mis)perceiving cooperativeness
- PMID: 34392064
- PMCID: PMC8896359
- DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.020
(Mis)perceiving cooperativeness
Abstract
Cooperation is crucial for the success of social interactions. Given its importance, humans should readily be able to use available cues to predict how likely others are to cooperate. Here, we review the empirical literature on how accurate such predictions are. To this end, we distinguish between three classes of cues: behavioral (including past decisions), personal (including gender, attractiveness, and group membership) and situational (including the benefits to cooperation and the ability to communicate with each other). We discuss (i) how each cue correlates with future cooperative decisions and (ii) whether people correctly anticipate each cue's predictive value. We find that people are fairly accurate in interpreting behavioral and situational cues. However, they often misperceive the value of personal cues.
Keywords: Cooperation; Cues; Perception; Social behavior.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement Nothing declared.
References
-
- Rand D.G., Nowak M.A. Human cooperation. Trends Cognit Sci. 2013;17:413–425. - PubMed
-
- Sigmund K. Princeton University Press; 2010. Calculus of selfishness.
-
- Apicella C.L., Silk J.B. The evolution of human cooperation. Curr Biol. 2019;29:R447–R450. - PubMed
-
- Hauser O.P., Hilbe C., Chatterjee K., Nowak M.A. Social dilemmas among unequals. Nature. 2019;572:524–527. - PubMed
-
- Fehr E., Fischbacher U. The nature of human altruism. Nature. 2003;425:785–791. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous