Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021;56(32):17915-17941.
doi: 10.1007/s10853-021-06404-0. Epub 2021 Aug 10.

Antimicrobial surfaces: a review of synthetic approaches, applicability and outlook

Affiliations
Review

Antimicrobial surfaces: a review of synthetic approaches, applicability and outlook

Urbashi Mahanta et al. J Mater Sci. 2021.

Abstract

The rapid spread of microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, and viruses can be extremely detrimental and can lead to seasonal epidemics or even pandemic situations. In addition, these microorganisms may bring about fouling of food and essential materials resulting in substantial economic losses. Typically, the microorganisms get transmitted by their attachment and growth on various household and high contact surfaces such as doors, switches, currency. To prevent the rapid spread of microorganisms, it is essential to understand the interaction between various microbes and surfaces which result in their attachment and growth. Such understanding is crucial in the development of antimicrobial surfaces. Here, we have reviewed different approaches to make antimicrobial surfaces and correlated surface properties with antimicrobial activities. This review concentrates on physical and chemical modification of the surfaces to modulate wettability, surface topography, and surface charge to inhibit microbial adhesion, growth, and proliferation. Based on these aspects, antimicrobial surfaces are classified into patterned surfaces, functionalized surfaces, superwettable surfaces, and smart surfaces. We have critically discussed the important findings from systems of developing antimicrobial surfaces along with the limitations of the current research and the gap that needs to be bridged before these approaches are put into practice.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10853-021-06404-0.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of various types of microorganisms a Bacteria b Fungus c Virus
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic diagram of different antimicrobial surfaces
Figure 3
Figure 3
a SEM image of A. fumigatus and F. oxysporum on flat and nanopillared surfaces b Antifungal activity of A. fumigatus and F. oxysporum at different time intervals. Adapted with permission from Ref. [51] Copyright (2019)American Chemical Society
Figure 4
Figure 4
Antibacterial mechanism of cicada wing surface. Adapted with permission from Ref. [46] Copyright (2013) Springer
Figure 5
Figure 5
Antibacterial mechanism of patterned micro-nanopillar surface. Adapted with permission from Ref. [49] Copyright (2019) KeAi
Figure 6
Figure 6
In vivo photothermal antibacterial activity of Ag@SnS2 material. Adapted with permission from Ref. [71] Copyright (2021) Royal Society of Chemistry
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mechanism of bacterial adhesion resistance on a superhydrophobic surface. Adapted with permission from Ref. [86] Copyright (2012) Taylor & Francis
Figure 8
Figure 8
Schematic representation of superhydrophobic and antibacterial surface showing the bacterial repealing and simultaneous killing of bacteria. Adapted with permission from Ref. [93] Copyright (2021) Wiley–VCH
Figure 9
Figure 9
The schematic diagram of a the antibacterial and b antifungal mechanism of superhydrophilic surface. Adapted with permission from Ref. [98] Copyright (2019) Elsevier
Figure 10
Figure 10
Thermoresponsive switchable antibacterial surface using lysozyme and PNIPAAm. Adapted with permission from Ref. [109] Copyright (2014) Royal Society of Chemistry
Figure 11
Figure 11
pH-responsive switchable antibacterial surface using AMP and PMAA. Adapted with permission from Ref. [111] Copyright (2016) American Chemical Society

References

    1. Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, et al. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int J Surg. 2020;78:185–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith KM, Machalaba CC, Seifman R, et al. Infectious disease and economics: the case for considering multi-sectoral impacts. One Heal. 2019;7:100080. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2018.100080. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rai NK, Ashok A, Akondi BR. Consequences of chemical impact of disinfectants: safe preventive measures against COVID-19. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2020;50:513–520. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2020.1790499. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun Z, Ostrikov K, (Ken), Future antiviral surfaces: lessons from COVID-19 pandemic. Sustain Mater Technol. 2020;25:e00203. doi: 10.1016/j.susmat.2020.e00203. - DOI
    1. Chin AWH, Chu JTS, Perera MRA, et al. Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in different environmental conditions. The Lancet Microbe. 2020;1:e10. doi: 10.1016/s2666-5247(20)30003-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources