Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug:160:107232.
doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2021.107232. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

Marginal false discovery rate for a penalized transformation survival model

Affiliations

Marginal false discovery rate for a penalized transformation survival model

Weijuan Liang et al. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Survival analysis that involves moderate/high dimensional covariates has become common. Most of the existing analyses have been focused on estimation and variable selection, using penalization and other regularization techniques. To draw more definitive conclusions, a handful of studies have also conducted inference. The recently developed mFDR (marginal false discovery rate) technique provides an alternative inference perspective and can be advantageous in multiple aspects. The existing inference studies for regularized estimation of survival data with moderate/high dimensional covariates assume the Cox and other specific models, which may not be sufficiently flexible. To tackle this problem, the analysis scope is expanded to the transformation model, which is robust and has been shown to be desirable for practical data analysis. Statistical validity is rigorously established. Two data analyses are conducted. Overall, an alternative inference approach has been developed for survival analysis with moderate/high dimensional data.

Keywords: Marginal false discovery rate; Survival analysis; Transformation model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Scheme of different associations with survival.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Simulation 1: estimated and actual mFDR values with various sample sizes (left), signal levels (middle), and dimensions (right).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Simulations 2 (left) and 3 (right): estimated mFDR values with various correlation coefficients.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Simulations 2 (left) and 3 (right): numbers of false and true positives with various correlation coefficients
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Analysis of Loan data (left) and SKCM data (right) using the proposed approach: estimated mFDR and number of covariates selected as a function of tuning.

References

    1. Breheny P, 2019. Marginal false discovery rates for penalized regression models. Biostatistics 20 (2), 299–314. - PubMed
    1. Chai H, Zhang Q, Huang J, Ma S, 2019. Inference for low-dimensional covariates in a high-dimensional accelerated failure time model. Statist. Sinica 29, 877–894. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fang EX, Ning Y, Li R, 2020. Test of significance for high-dimensional longitudinal data. Ann. Statist 48 (5), 2622–2645. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fang EX, Ning Y, Liu H, 2016. Testing and confidence intervals for high dimensional proportional hazards model. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol 79 (5), 1415–1437. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Han AK, 1987. Non-parametric analysis of a generalized regression model: the maximum rank correlation estimator. J. Econometrics 35 (2–3), 303–316.

LinkOut - more resources