Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 6:14:1171-1185.
doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S324081. eCollection 2021.

The Effects of Leaders' Prosocial Orientation on Employees' Organizational Citizenship Behavior - The Roles of Affective Commitment and Workplace Ostracism

Dan Wang  1 , Yunyun Qin  1 , Wenjie Zhou  2
Affiliations

The Effects of Leaders' Prosocial Orientation on Employees' Organizational Citizenship Behavior - The Roles of Affective Commitment and Workplace Ostracism

Dan Wang et al. Psychol Res Behav Manag. .

Abstract

Purpose: According to leadership trait theory, leaders' personality traits are stable factors in organizational situations and exert significant effects on employees' organizational behaviors. However, studies related to this topic are very limited. In this study, from the leadership trait perspective and based on social identity theory and social exchange theory, the influencing mechanisms of leaders' prosocial tendencies on affiliation-oriented and challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors are investigated. Specifically, leadership prosocial tendency, affective commitment and workplace ostracism are selected as the independent variable, mediating variable and moderating variable, respectively.

Methods: The data collection is conducted in two stages in which the leader-employee pairing method is adopted. Ultimately, 347 valid questionnaires are collected from 73 teams. Later, the hierarchical regression analysis and bootstrap methods are used to test the study's hypotheses.

Results: Leadership prosocial tendencies have significant positive effects on affective commitment (β = 0.282, p < 0.001), affiliation-oriented (β = 0.648, p < 0.001) and challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors (β = 0.521, p < 0.001). There is a significant positive effect of affective commitment on affiliation-oriented (β = 0.103, p < 0.05) and challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors (β = 0.122, p < 0.05). At the same time, the influence of leadership prosocial tendencies on affiliation-oriented (β = 0.619, p < 0.001) and challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors (β = 0.487, p < 0.001) remains significant. In other words, affective commitment partially mediates the relationships between leaders' prosocial tendencies and affiliation-oriented, challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. Workplace ostracism plays a negative moderating role between leaders' prosocial tendencies and affective commitment (β = -0.098, p < 0.05). Furthermore, workplace ostracism can also mediate the mediating role of affective commitment with 95% bias-corrected confidence intervals [-0.146, -0.017] and [-0.114, -0.003].

Conclusion: The results show that leaders' prosocial tendencies have significant positive effects on both affiliation-oriented and challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. Affective commitment partially mediates the relationships between leaders' prosocial tendencies and affiliation-oriented and challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors. Workplace ostracism significantly negatively moderates the relationship between leaders' prosocial tendencies and affective commitment. Moreover, the study verifies that the mediating effect of workplace ostracism on affective commitment has a significant moderating effect.

Keywords: affective commitment; affiliation-oriented organizational citizenship behavior; challenge-oriented organizational citizenship behavior; leader’s prosocial orientation; workplace ostracism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Theoretical model.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The moderating effects of workplace ostracism on the relationship between leader’s prosocial orientation and employees’ affective commitment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bennett N, Lemoine J. What VUCA really means for you. Harv Bus Rev. 2014;92:1/2.
    1. Arne LE, Berge MS. Viking leadership: how Norwegian transformational leadership style effects creativity and change through organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Int J Cross Cultural Manag. 2018;18(3):309–325.
    1. Gupta V, Agarwal UA, Khatri N. The relationships between perceived organizational support, affective commitment, psychological contract breach, organizational citizenship behaviour and work engagement. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(3):1624. - PubMed
    1. Joanne CSH, Kim KOM. Antecedents of civic virtue and altruistic organizational citizenship behavior in Macau. Soc Bus Rev. 2021;16(1):113–133. doi:10.1108/SBR-06-2020-0085 - DOI
    1. Torlak N, Gokhan CK, Muhammet SD, Budur T. Links connecting nurses’ planned behavior, burnout, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. J Workplace Behav Health. 2021;36(1):77–103. doi:10.1080/15555240.2020.1862675 - DOI