Response from the Authors
- PMID: 34395045
- PMCID: PMC8354352
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713611
Response from the Authors
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest R.G.C. has no potential conflict of interest to disclose. A.T.R. is a scientific advisory board member for Breas Medical US, received honoraria for lecturing and developing educational materials for Vapotherm, Inc., and continues to receive royalties from Elsevier for editorial work on a pediatric critical care textbook.
Comment on
-
High-Flow Nasal Cannula versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Critical Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Pilot.J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2020 Dec;9(4):248-255. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1709656. Epub 2020 Apr 17. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2020. PMID: 33133739 Free PMC article.
-
Truth Has Nothing to Do with the Conclusion, and Everything to Do with the Methodology.J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2021 Mar;10(1):83-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713612. Epub 2020 Jul 21. J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2021. PMID: 33585068 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP) . Milési C, Essouri S, Pouyau R. High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for the initial respiratory management of acute viral bronchiolitis in young infants: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (TRAMONTANE study) Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(02):209–216. - PubMed
-
- Shein S L, Slain K N, Rotta A T, Milési C, Cambonie G. High-flow nasal cannula flow rate in young infants with severe viral bronchiolitis: the question is still open. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(01):134–135. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
