Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 9;5(3):2473974X211032644.
doi: 10.1177/2473974X211032644. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.

Readability of Online Materials Related to Vocal Cord Leukoplakia

Affiliations

Readability of Online Materials Related to Vocal Cord Leukoplakia

Matthew Shneyderman et al. OTO Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess readability and understandability of online materials for vocal cord leukoplakia.

Study design: Review of online materials.

Setting: Academic medical center.

Methods: A Google search of "vocal cord leukoplakia" was performed, and the first 50 websites were considered for analysis. Readability was measured by the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG). Understandability and actionability were assessed by 2 independent reviewers with the PEMAT-P (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials). Unpaired t tests compared scores between sites aimed at physicians and those at patients, and a Cohen's kappa was calculated to measure interrater reliability.

Results: Twenty-two websites (17 patient oriented, 5 physician oriented) met inclusion criteria. For the entire cohort, FRES, FKGL, and SMOG scores (mean ± SD) were 36.90 ± 20.65, 12.96 ± 3.28, and 15.65 ± 3.57, respectively, indicating that materials were difficult to read at a >12th-grade level. PEMAT-P understandability and actionability scores were 73.65% ± 7.05% and 13.63% ± 22.47%. Statistically, patient-oriented sites were more easily read than physician-oriented sites (P < .02 for each of the FRES, FKGL, and SMOG comparisons); there were no differences in understandability or actionability scores between these categories of sites.

Conclusion: Online materials for vocal cord leukoplakia are written at a level more advanced than what is recommended for patient education materials. Awareness of the current ways that these online materials are failing our patients may lead to improved education materials in the future.

Keywords: Flesch Reading Ease Score; Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level; Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials; readability; understandability; vocal cord leukoplakia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Correlation between PEMAT-P understandability score and FKGL. FKGL, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level; PEMAT-P, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Correlation between PEMAT-P understandability score and SMOG. PEMAT-P, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials; SMOG, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Correlation between PEMAT-P understandability score and FRES. FRES, Flesch Reading Ease Score; PEMAT-P, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials.

References

    1. Weiss B.Health Literacy: A Manual for Clinicians. American Medical Association Foundation and American Medical Association; 2007.
    1. Gaines T, Malik RD.Readability of pelvic floor dysfunction questionnaires. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(2):813-818. doi: 10.1002/nau.24286 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alwani MM, Campiti VJ, Bandali EH, Nesemeier BR, Ting JY, Shipchandler TZ.Evaluation of the quality of printed online education materials in cosmetic facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med. 2020;22(4):255-261. doi: 10.1089/fpsam.2019.0013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arslan D, Sami Tutar M, Kozanhan B, Bagci Z.The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur. Cardiol Young. 2020;30(3):328-336. doi: 10.1017/S104795111900307X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel AJ, Kloosterboer A, Yannuzzi NA, Venkateswaran N, Sridhar J.Evaluation of the content, quality, and readability of patient accessible online resources regarding cataracts. Semin Ophthalmol. Published online February26, 2021. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1893758 - DOI - PMC - PubMed