Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 7;10(17):e021236.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021236. Epub 2021 Aug 16.

Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Concealed Long-QT Syndrome

Affiliations

Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Concealed Long-QT Syndrome

Laura Kasak et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Recurrent pregnancy loss affects 1% to 2% of couples attempting childbirth. A large fraction of all cases remains idiopathic, which warrants research into monogenic causes of this distressing disorder. Methods and Results We investigated a nonconsanguineous Estonian family who had experienced 5 live births, intersected by 3 early pregnancy losses, and 6 fetal deaths, 3 of which occurred during the second trimester. No fetal malformations were described at the autopsies performed in 3 of 6 cases of fetal death. Parental and fetal chromosomal abnormalities (including submicroscopic) and maternal risk factors were excluded. Material for genetic testing was available from 4 miscarried cases (gestational weeks 11, 14, 17, and 18). Exome sequencing in 3 pregnancy losses and the mother identified no rare variants explicitly shared by the miscarried conceptuses. However, the mother and 2 pregnancy losses carried a heterozygous nonsynonymous variant, resulting in p.Val173Asp (rs199472695) in the ion channel gene KCNQ1. It is expressed not only in heart, where mutations cause type 1 long-QT syndrome, but also in other tissues, including uterus. The p.Val173Asp variant has been previously identified in a patient with type 1 long-QT syndrome, but not reported in the Genome Aggregation Database. With heterologous expression in CHO cells, our in vitro electrophysiologic studies indicated that the mutant slowly activating voltage-gated K+ channel (IKs) is dysfunctional. It showed reduced total activating and deactivating currents (P<0.01), with dramatically positive shift of voltage dependence of activation by ≈10 mV (P<0.05). Conclusions The current study uncovered concealed maternal type 1 long-QT syndrome as a potential novel cause behind recurrent fetal loss.

Keywords: KCNQ1; exome; long‐QT syndrome; miscarriage; recurrent pregnancy loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Identification of the KCNQ1 variant.
A, Pedigree of the family. Circles denote female family members, squares denote male members, and triangles indicate spontaneous pregnancy losses. The proband is indicated with an arrow. Solid symbols indicate pedigree members, whose genomic DNA was subjected to exome sequencing. B, Sanger sequencing confirmation of the KCNQ1 p.V173D variant (rs199472695) in the family. C, Molecular position of the KV7.1 variant p.V173D in the first C‐loop. D, The conservation of the amino acid residue affected by the KCNQ1 variant in different species. d, death; ECT indicates ectopic pregnancy; trim, trimester; wks, gestational weeks; WT, wild type and yrs, years.
Figure 2
Figure 2. KCNQ1 mutation p.V173D caused a loss of cardiac I Ks function.
A and B, Typical I Ks traces recorded in CHO cells in which either wild‐type (WT) KCNQ1 or V173D were coexpressed with WT KCNE1. C and D, I Ks steady‐state and tail current densities in the 2 groups of cells (n=10 each). The mutant channel p.V173D significantly reduced total I Ks steady‐state and tail currents with a dramatic positive shift of the voltage dependence of activation, by ≈10 mV (P<0.05). Current densities were expressed in pA/pF after normalization of current amplitude to cell capacitance. The voltage clamp protocol is shown in the insert.

References

    1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address asrm@asrm.org . Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020;113:533–535. - PubMed
    1. Bender Atik R, Christiansen OB, Elson J, Kolte AM, Lewis S, Middeldorp S, Nelen W, Peramo B, Quenby S, Vermeulen N, et al. Eshre guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Open. 2018;2018:hoy004. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoy004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kasak L, Rull K, Laan M. Genetics and genomics of recurrent pregnancy loss. In: Leung P, Qiao J, eds. Human Reproductive and Prenatal Genetics. 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press Inc; 2019:463–494. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813570-9.00021-8. - DOI
    1. Woolner AMF, Nagdeve P, Raja EA, Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharya S. Family history and risk of miscarriage: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:1584–1594. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13940. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rull K, Nagirnaja L, Laan M. Genetics of recurrent miscarriage: challenges, current knowledge, future directions. Front Genet. 2012;3:34. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00034. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources