Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 16;21(1):301.
doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01443-w.

Intrauterine devices migrated into the bladder: two case reports and literature review

Affiliations
Review

Intrauterine devices migrated into the bladder: two case reports and literature review

Guangtao Liu et al. BMC Womens Health. .

Abstract

Background: Intrauterine devices (IUD) are widely used all over the world. One of the most serious complications is uterine perforation, and it is very rare for the IUD to penetrate the bladder after perforation. Here we report two cases of IUD migration into the bladder, and review the literature to analyze the possible causes and solutions of such complications.

Case presentation: Case NO. 1 is a 37-year-old female who presented lower urinary tract symptoms for a year. Cystoscopy showed that a strip of metal penetrated into the bladder, and the surface was covered with stones. The patient underwent cystotomy and foreign body removal under general anesthesia. Case NO. 2 is a 46-year-old woman who previously inserted an IUD in 1998, but she had an unexpected pregnancy in 1999. Her doctor believed that "the IUD had spontaneously expulsed" and a new IUD was inserted after her pregnancy was terminated. Her CT scan showed an IUD on the left side of the bladder and another IUD in the uterus. Her foreign body was removed by cystotomy.

Conclusion: Patients with IUD should be suggested to check the device regularly, and those who with a missed IUD have to rule out the possibility of IUD migration. For patients with IUD combined with lower urinary tract symptoms, it is necessary to be aware of whether IUD perforation affects the bladder.

Keywords: Bladder; Case report; Intrauterine devices; Lower urinary symptoms; Migration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
IUD of case NO.1 (a: CT scan indicating a triangular foreign body penetrated the bladder wall. b: Cystoscopy showed a strip of metal substance penetrated through the bladder wall, and the surface was covered with stones. c: Intraoperative photograph showed that a branch of the IUD passed through the bladder wall. d: The removed IUD.)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
IUDs of case NO.2 (a and b: IVP demonstrating two IUDs in the pelvic cavity, one of them was in the bladder. c: Her CT scan showing an IUD penetrated the left side of the bladder. d: The removed IUD.)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cheung ML, Rezai S. Retained intrauterine device (IUD): triple case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018;2018:9362962. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahmutyazicioglu K, Ozdemir H, Ozkan P. Migration of an intrauterine contraceptive device to the urinary bladder: sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound: JCU. 2002;30(8):496–498. doi: 10.1002/jcu.10098. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tan JH, Lip H, Ong W, et al. Intrauterine contraceptive device embedded in bladder wall with calculus formation removed successfully with open surgery. Malaysian Fam Phys: Off J Acad Fam Phys Malaysia. 2019;14(2):29–31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sano M, Nemoto K, Miura T, et al. Endoscopic treatment of intrauterine device migration into the bladder with stone formation. J Endourol Case Rep. 2017;3(1):105–107. doi: 10.1089/cren.2017.0038. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kallat A, Ibrahimi A, Fahsi O, et al. Intrauterine device: about a rare complication and literature review. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;27:193. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.193.13106. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources