The Coaches' Efficacy Expectations of Youth Soccer Players with Different Maturity Status and Physical Performance
- PMID: 34401007
- PMCID: PMC8336556
- DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2021-0083
The Coaches' Efficacy Expectations of Youth Soccer Players with Different Maturity Status and Physical Performance
Abstract
This study aimed to report possible anthropometrical and physical performance differences between youth soccer players with different maturity status and to report the coaches' expectations, hypothesizing that coaches would expect more from players with advanced maturity. One hundred twenty-two (122) players completed a physical performance battery. Their maturity status was estimated and the coaches' efficacy expectations (CEEs) were assessed. Players with advanced maturation had better physical performance (F = 26.5-73.4; p < 0.01) and their CEEs for strength-related tasks were different according to the maturity status (F = 8.3-10.9; p < 0.01), but not for speed-related tests, nor for their general ability to play soccer. Normalized data showed significant differences between physical performance tests and their respective CEEs within each maturity group, especially in the Post-PHV group. This study confirms the physical advantages of players with advanced maturity while it shows controversial results of how maturation affects the coaches' perceptions and, indirectly, the coaches' identification and selection of talented players.
Keywords: maturation; self-efficacy; youth.
© 2021 Iván Peña-González, Tomas García-Calvo, Eduardo M. Cervelló, Manuel Moya-Ramón.
References
-
- Beunen G, Malina RM. Growth and Biologic Maturation: Relevance to Athletic Performance. The Young Athlete. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 3-17; 2008. - DOI
-
- Bruton AM, Mellalieu SD, Shearer DA. Validation of a single-item stem for collective efficacy measurement in sports teams. Int J Sport Exerc Psychol., 2016;14(4):383–401. doi: 10.1080/1612197X.2015.1054853. - DOI
-
- Christensen MK. “An eye for talent”: Talent identification and the “practical sense” of top-level soccer coaches. Sociol Sport J. 2009;26(3):365–382. doi: 10.1123/ssj.26.3.365. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources