Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 7:25:100428.
doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100428. eCollection 2021 Sep.

A systematic review of the engagement with social media-delivered interventions for improving health outcomes among sexual and gender minorities

César G Escobar-Viera  1 , Eleanna M Melcher  2 , Rebekah S Miller  3 , Darren L Whitfield  4 , Daniel Jacobson-López  5 , Jacob D Gordon  6 , Adrian J Ballard  6 , Bruce L Rollman  7 , Sherry Pagoto  8
Affiliations
Review

A systematic review of the engagement with social media-delivered interventions for improving health outcomes among sexual and gender minorities

César G Escobar-Viera et al. Internet Interv. .

Abstract

Background: Sexual and gender minority (SGM) persons face a number of physical and mental health disparities closely linked to discrimination, social stigma, and victimization. Despite the acceptability and increasing number of digital health interventions focused on improving health outcomes among SGM people, there is a lack of reviews summarizing whether and how researchers assess engagement with social media-delivered health interventions for this group.

Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize and critique the evidence on evaluation of engagement with social media-delivered interventions for improving health outcomes among SGM persons.

Methods: We conducted a literature search for studies published between January 2003 and June 2020 using 4 electronic databases. Articles were included if they were peer-reviewed, in English language, assessed engagement with a social media-delivered health intervention for improving health outcomes among sexual and gender minorities. A minimum of two authors independently extracted data from each study using an a priori developed abstraction form. We assessed quality of data reporting using the CONSORT extension for pilot and feasibility studies and CONSORT statement parallel group randomized trials.

Results: We included 18 articles in the review; 15 were feasibility studies and 3 were efficacy or effectiveness randomized trials. The quality of data reporting varied considerably. The vast majority of articles focused on improving HIV-related outcomes among men who have sex with men. Only three studies recruited cisgender women and/or transgender persons. We found heterogeneity in how engagement was defined and assessed. Intervention usage from social media data was the most frequently used engagement measure.

Conclusion: In addition to the heterogeneity in defining and assessing engagement, we found that the focus of assessment was often on measures of intervention usage only. More purposeful recruitment is needed to learn about whether, how, and why different SGM groups engage with social media-interventions. This leaves significant room for future research to expand evaluation criteria for cognitive and emotional aspects of intervention engagement in order to develop effective and tailored social media-delivered interventions for SGM people. Our findings also support the need for developing and testing social media-delivered interventions that focus on improving mental health and outcomes related to chronic health conditions among SGM persons.

Keywords: Digital health interventions; LGBTQ+; Mental health; Sexual and gender minorities; Social media; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of studies screened and included in a 2020 systematic review of engagement with social media−delivered interventions for improving health outcomes among sexual and gender minorities.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alarcón Gutiérrez M., Fernández Quevedo M., Martín Valle S., Jacques-Aviñó C., Díez David E., Caylà J.A., García De Olalla P. Acceptability and effectiveness of using mobile applications to promote HIV and other STI testing among men who have sex with men in Barcelona, Spain. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2018;94(6):443–448. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053348. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychological Association Guidelines for psychological practice with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Am. Psychol. 2012;67(1):10–42. doi: 10.1037/a0024659. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychological Association Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people. Am. Psychol. 2015;70(9):832–864. doi: 10.1037/a0039906. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anand T., Nitpolprasert C., Ananworanich J., Pakam C., Nonenoy S., Jantarapakde J., Sohn A.H., Phanuphak P., Phanuphak N. Innovative strategies using communications technologies to engage gay men and other men who have sex with men into early HIV testing and treatment in Thailand. J. Virus Erad. 2015;1(2):111–115. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27482400%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.n... - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson M., Jiang J. Pew Research Center; 2018. Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018.http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/

LinkOut - more resources