The "EPiQ"-Study (Evaluation of preanalytical quality): S-Monovette® in manual aspiration mode drastically reduces hemolytic samples in head-to-head study
- PMID: 34401434
- PMCID: PMC8353461
- DOI: 10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00252
The "EPiQ"-Study (Evaluation of preanalytical quality): S-Monovette® in manual aspiration mode drastically reduces hemolytic samples in head-to-head study
Abstract
Background: Hemolytic blood samples are the number one cause for specimen rejection at emergency departments. Triggered by unsuitable blood sampling material or incorrect handling and a related strong vacuum force, hemolytic samples often must be retaken. The objective of this study was to assess whether correct manual aspiration using S-Monovette® could reduce the number of hemolytic samples.
Methods: Between January and April 2019, a head-to-head study was conducted. Whereas in the first eight weeks, all specimens were collected using Vacutainer®, in the second eight weeks, blood was taken using S-Monovette® in aspiration mode. Specimens were categorized into five classes (0-30, 31-50, 51-75, 76-100, and 101+ mg/dl of cell-free hemoglobin) and for the statistical analyses, all samples exceeding 30 mg/dl were classified as hemolytic.
Results: Data were collected on 4794 blood specimens (Vacutainer®: 2634 samples, S-Monovette®: 2160 samples). While the percentage of non-hemolytic samples (HI of 0-30 mg/dl) was substantially higher for specimens drawn by S-Monovette® (95.7 %) than Vacutainer® (83.0 %), the opposite was true for all HI categories above 30 mg/dl. Importantly, the reduction of hemolytic samples took place immediately following the imposition of S-Monovette® and remained stable at a low level until the end of the study.
Conclusions: Based on our results, we conclude that switching to S-Monovette® in manual aspiration mode in the blood sampling process could be highly beneficial, not only from a financial point of view, but also with regards to reducing unnecessary tasks and stress for nursing staff and improving patient outcome overall.
Keywords: Clinical blood sampling; Hemolysis; Manual aspiration; S-Monovette®.
© 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
The funding organization played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
Figures



References
-
- Shahangian S., Snyder S.R. Why Is the laboratory an afterthought for managed care organizations. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2009;131:418–431. - PubMed
-
- Becich M.J. Information management: moving from test results to clinical information. Clin. Leader Manag. Rev. 2000;14:296–300. - PubMed
-
- Lippi G., Plebani M., Di Somma S., Cervellin G. Hemolyzed specimens: a major challenge for emergency departments and clinical laboratories. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab Sci. 2011;48:143–153. - PubMed
-
- Stark A., Jones B.A., Chapman D., Well K., Krajenta R., Meier F.A., Zarbo R.J. Clinical laboratory specimen rejection–association with the site of patient care and patients' characteristics: findings from a single health care organization. Arch. Pathol. Lab Med. 2007;131:88–592. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous