Indirect treatment comparison of solriamfetol, modafinil, and armodafinil for excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea
- PMID: 34402784
- PMCID: PMC8726370
- DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.9610
Indirect treatment comparison of solriamfetol, modafinil, and armodafinil for excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea
Abstract
Study objectives: Excessive daytime sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea affects 9%-22% of continuous positive airway pressure-treated patients. An indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis was performed to compare efficacy and safety of medications (solriamfetol, modafinil, and armodafinil) approved to treat excessive daytime sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea.
Methods: Efficacy and safety measures assessed in this indirect treatment comparison included Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), 20-minute Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT20), Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (any, serious, or leading to discontinuation).
Results: A systematic literature review identified 6 parallel-arm, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials that randomized 1,714 total participants to placebo, solriamfetol, modafinil, or armodafinil. In this indirect treatment comparison, all comparators were associated with greater improvements than placebo on the ESS, MWT20, and CGI-C after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. Relative to comparators and placebo at 12 weeks, solriamfetol at 150 mg or 300 mg had the highest probabilities of improvement in the ESS, MWT20, and CGI-C. Modafinil (200 or 400 mg) and solriamfetol (150 or 300 mg) were associated with greater improvement on the FOSQ than placebo at 12 weeks. Less than 2% of patients using placebo or comparators experienced serious or discontinuation-related treatment-emergent adverse events.
Conclusions: The results of this indirect treatment comparison show 12 weeks of treatment with solriamfetol, modafinil, and armodafinil resulted in varying levels of improvement on the ESS, MWT20, and CGI-C and similar safety risks in participants with excessive daytime sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea.
Citation: Ronnebaum S, Bron M, Patel D, et al. Indirect treatment comparison of solriamfetol, modafinil, and armodafinil for excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(12):2543-2555.
Keywords: Epworth Sleepiness Scale; armodafinil; modafinil; obstructive sleep apnea; solriamfetol.
© 2021 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have seen and approved the manuscript. Work for this study was performed at Jazz Pharmaceuticals and OPEN Health. This study was funded by Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Sarah Ronnebaum, Eleanor Lucas, David Kratochvil, and Dipen Patel are employees of OPEN Health, which received funding from Jazz Pharmaceuticals to conduct the analysis. Morgan Bron, Diane Menno, and Shay Bujanover are current or former employees of Jazz Pharmaceuticals who, in the course of their employment, have received stock options exercisable for, and other stock awards of, ordinary shares of Jazz Pharmaceuticals plc. Carl Stepnowsky reports no conflicts of interest.
Figures






References
-
- American Academy of Sleep Medicine . International Classification of Sleep Disorders. 3rd ed. Darien, IL: : American Academy of Sleep Medicine; ; 2014. .
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) . Continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta139 . Accessed November 18, 2020.
-
- Gasa M, Tamisier R, Launois SH, et al. ; Scientific Council of the Sleep Registry of the French Federation of Pneumology-FFP . Residual sleepiness in sleep apnea patients treated by continuous positive airway pressure . J Sleep Res. 2013. ; 22 ( 4 ): 389 – 397 . - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources