Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;87(1):289-309.
doi: 10.1007/s11336-021-09799-6. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

Second-Order Disjoint Factor Analysis

Affiliations

Second-Order Disjoint Factor Analysis

Carlo Cavicchia et al. Psychometrika. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Hierarchical models are often considered to measure latent concepts defining nested sets of manifest variables. Therefore, by supposing a hierarchical relationship among manifest variables, the general latent concept can be represented by a tree structure where each internal node represents a specific order of abstraction for the latent concept measured. In this paper, we propose a new latent factor model called second-order disjoint factor analysis in order to model an unknown hierarchical structure of the manifest variables with two orders. This is a second-order factor analysis, which-respect to the second-order confirmatory factor analysis-is exploratory, nested and estimated simultaneously by maximum likelihood method. Each subset of manifest variables is modeled to be internally consistent and reliable, that is, manifest variables related to a factor measure "consistently" a unique theoretical construct. This feature implies that manifest variables are positively correlated with the related factor and, therefore, the associated factor loadings are constrained to be nonnegative. A cyclic block coordinate descent algorithm is proposed to maximize the likelihood. We present a simulation study that investigates the ability to get reliable factors. Furthermore, the new model is applied to identify the underlying factors of well-being showing the characteristics of the new methodology. A final discussion completes the paper.

Keywords: factor analysis; hierarchical models; latent variable models; reflective models; second-order.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(50×50) Correlation matrix with a block diagonal structure in four blocks
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example of second-order disjoint factor model
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Heatmaps of examples of correlation matrix produced by the simulation study with different levels of error. First row: scenario n=200, J=20, H=5; second row: scenario n=200, J=50, H=10

References

    1. Abdi, H. (2003). Factor rotations in factor analyses. In Encyclopedia of social sciences research methods, pp. 792–795.
    1. Adachi K, Trendafilov NT. Sparsest factor analysis for clustering variables: A matrix decomposition approach. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification. 2018;12:559–585. doi: 10.1007/s11634-017-0284-z. - DOI
    1. Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Selected papers of hirotugu akaike (pp. 199–213). Springer New York.
    1. Anderson TW, Rubin H. Statistical inferences in factor analysis. Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. 1956;5:111–150.
    1. Bartlett MS. The statistical conception of mental factors. British Journal of Psychology. General Section. 1937;28(1):97–104. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1937.tb00863.x. - DOI