Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 11;13(7):e16308.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.16308. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Results of a Pilot Study on the Safety and Early Efficacy of Novel Polymethyl Methacrylate Microspheres and a Hyaluronic Acid Device for the Treatment of Low Back Pain Caused by Degenerative and Diseased Intervertebral Discs of the Lumbar Spine

Affiliations

Results of a Pilot Study on the Safety and Early Efficacy of Novel Polymethyl Methacrylate Microspheres and a Hyaluronic Acid Device for the Treatment of Low Back Pain Caused by Degenerative and Diseased Intervertebral Discs of the Lumbar Spine

James Yu et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Low back pain (LBP) costs the healthcare system billions of dollars each year. Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a significant cause of LBP, due to structural defects, biomechanical instability, and inflammation. First-line therapy for patients with LBP includes physical therapy, medication, and steroid injections. DiscSealTM was developed to provide patients who are refractory to first-line therapy with a minimally invasive treatment alternative to invasive surgical procedures. The product is a combination of poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) microspheres in hyaluronic acid (HA) that is injected under modified discography into the IVD. Methods Two pain specialist centers in Australia recruited eligible participants who were followed up for 180 days post-procedure. The procedure was conducted using a modified discography technique. Low back and leg pain was reported using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) while other endpoints included were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Clinician and Patient Global Impact of Change, and Patient Rating of Overall Health Status. The general analytical approach for all endpoints was descriptive in nature and 95% confidence intervals of means were estimated. Results The pilot study achieved its primary objective which was an absence of peri-treatment or post-treatment device-related Serious Adverse Events (SAE) during the first 90 days. There were no device-related serious adverse events recorded throughout the study. The mean LBP percentage change from baseline at 90 and 180 days was -27.0% and -42.3% respectively. The mean ODI percentage change from baseline at 90 and 180 days was -22.3 and -14.2% respectively. End of study improvements shows a 67.8% (20.83) increase in Overall Health Status, as well as positive results for Participant and Clinician Global Impact of Change. These results were achieved based on treating one diseased IVD, although 83.3% of patients were diagnosed with multiple diseased IVDs. Conclusions The results from this pilot study showed that DiscSealTM is safe and well-tolerated. Early efficacy shows that DiscSealTM may be a promising treatment option for people suffering from discogenic LBP that have not responded to first-line treatment options. A larger, statistically powered study where all diseased discs are treated should be completed to validate the promising results from this early feasibility study.

Keywords: chronic low back pain (clbp); clinical trial; degenerative disc disease; discogenic back pain; first in human.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The investigational product, DiscSeal is patented. Dr James Yu, Dr Alex Gavino and Dr Masego Johnstone are employees of Australian Medical Research. Australian Medical Research was paid by SpineOvations, Inc. to conduct the study. Dr Paul Verrills and Dr Jacqui Young are employees of Metro Pain Group. Metro Pain Group was paid by SpineOvations, Inc. to conduct the study. No individual authors were paid directly to conduct the study.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Visual Analogue Score for Low back pain and Leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index Score for the Intent to Treat Population (all Participants)
LBP - Low back pain, VAS - Visual Analogue Scale, ODI - Oswestry Disability Index
Figure 2
Figure 2. Visual Analogue Scores for Low Back Pain Over Time for all Patients, the Per Protocol Population and Single Disc Diseased Participant

References

    1. Estimating cost of care for patients with acute low back pain: a retrospective review of patient records. Crow WT, Willis DR. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19369510/ J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2009;109:229–233. - PubMed
    1. What are the most common conditions in primary care? Systematic review. Finley CR, Chan DS, Garrison S, et al. https://www.cfp.ca/content/64/11/832.short. Can Fam Physician. 2018;64:832–840. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Priority diseases and reasons for inclusion. World Health Organisation. [Jul;2021 ];Organisation WH. https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/priority_medicines/Ch6_24LBP.pdf World Health Organisation. 6.24:1–3.
    1. Discogenic back pain: literature review of definition, diagnosis, and treatment. Fujii K, Yamazaki M, Kang JD, et al. JBMR Plus. 2019;3:0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Noninvasive treatments for acute, subacute, and chronic low back pain: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166:514–530. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources