Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 28:21:101531.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101531. eCollection 2021 Oct.

Authorship decision-making in the field of orthopedic surgery and sports medicine

Affiliations

Authorship decision-making in the field of orthopedic surgery and sports medicine

F Ruben H Nurmohamed et al. J Clin Orthop Trauma. .

Abstract

Purpose: To facilitate decision-making in authorship positions, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editor (ICMJE) developed a guideline that stipulates criteria authors should meet in order to merit authorship. Authors who did not meet these criteria and still enlisted as authors, are called 'honorary' authors. In this study, the prevalence and characteristics of honorary authorship (HA) is assessed in the field of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

Methods: A survey was distributed among corresponding authors of articles published in 2019 in six Orthopedics-dedicated journals.

Results: 479 of the 1392 approached authors responded, leading to a response rate of 34.4%. 91.6% of the respondents were aware of the ICMJE guidelines, whereas 67.8% were aware of the issue of HA. Overall, the prevalence of guideline-based HA was 41.9%, while the prevalence of self-perceived HA was 14.7%. Having a senior member automatically enlisted as author on the departments, was associated with a higher rate of guideline-based HA (OR 5.03) and self-perceived HA (OR 3.31).

Conclusions: The prevalence of HA in the field of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine is high, but comparable to other medical fields. Transparency in authorship decision-making is crucial to maintain liability in scientific articles.

Keywords: Honorary authorship; Honorary authorship, HA; ICMJE-Guidelines; Orthopedics; the International Committee of Medical Journal Editor, ICMJE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the study procedures.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Map showing the respondents working locations.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Prevalence Guideline based- and self-perceived HA.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Opinions on five statements regarding authorship and authorship guidelines.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. EotICoMJ Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/d... Available at. - PubMed
    1. Eisenberg R.L., Ngo L., Boiselle P.M., Bankier A.A. Honorary authorship in radiologic research articles: assessment of frequency and associated factors. Radiology. 2011;259:479–486. - PubMed
    1. Eisenberg R.L., Ngo L.H., Heidinger B.H., Bankier A.A. Honorary authorship in radiologic research articles: assessment of pattern and longitudinal evolution. Acad Radiol. 2018;25:1451–1456. - PubMed
    1. Flanagin A., Carey L.A., Fontanarosa P.B. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals. JAMA. 1998;280:222–224. - PubMed
    1. Gadjradj P.S., Fezzazi R.E., Meppelder C.A. Letter: honorary authorship in neurosurgical literature: a cross-sectional analysis. Neurosurgery. 2018;82:E25–E28. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources