Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr;71(4):795-806.
doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-03025-z. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

GRIK2 is a target for bladder cancer stem-like cell-targeting immunotherapy

Affiliations

GRIK2 is a target for bladder cancer stem-like cell-targeting immunotherapy

Haruka Miyata et al. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Recent studies have revealed that treatment-resistant cancer stem-like cells (CSCs)/cancer-initiating cells (CICs) can be targeted by cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). CTLs recognize antigenic peptides derived from tumor-associated antigens; thus, the identification of tumor-associated antigens expressed by CSCs/CICs is essential. Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) ligandome analysis using mass spectrometry enables the analysis of naturally expressed antigenic peptides; however, HLA ligandome analysis requires a large number of cells and is challenging for CSCs/CICs. In this study, we established a novel bladder CSC/CIC model from a bladder cancer cell line (UM-UC-3 cells) using an ALDEFLUOR assay. CSCs/CICs were isolated as aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)-high cells and several ALDHhigh clone cells were established. ALDHhigh clone cells were enriched with CSCs/CICs by sphere formation and tumorigenicity in immunodeficient mice. HLA ligandome analysis and cap analysis of gene expression using ALDHhigh clone cells revealed a distinctive antigenic peptide repertoire in bladder CSCs/CICs, and we found that a glutamate receptor, ionotropic, kainite 2 (GRIK2)-derived antigenic peptide (LMYDAVHVV) was specifically expressed by CSCs/CICs. A GRIK2 peptide-specific CTL clone recognized GRIK2-overexpressing UM-UC-3 cells and ALDHhigh clone cells, indicating that GRIK2 peptide can be a novel target for bladder CSC/CIC-targeting immunotherapy.

Keywords: Antigen; Bladder cancer; Cancer stem cell; Cytotoxic T lymphocytes; GRIK2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Establishment of a bladder CSC/CIC model. A ALDEFLUOR assay of the UM-UC-3 human bladder cancer line cell. Left panel: UM-UC-3 cells were stained with BODIPY®-aminoacetaldehyde and analyzed by FACS. The ALDHhigh-positive gate was defined by a sample treated with the ALDH1 inhibitor DEAB. The top 0.9% (ALDHhigh) and lower 0.9% (ALDHlow) cells were single cell sorted and cultured for more than 1 month. Right panel: Clone cells established from ALDHhigh and ALDHlow cells were analyzed by an ALDEFLUOR assay. The ALDHhigh-positive gate was defined by a sample treated with DEAB. Percentages indicate the ALDHhigh-positive rates. Clone cells derived from ALDHhigh cells (H-1, H-6, and H-10) and ALDHlow cells (L-1, L-3, and L-8) were analyzed. B Sphere-formation assay of UM-UC-3 WT, H-10, and L-3 cells. Sphere-forming ability of WT UM-UC-3 cells, ALDHhigh cells (H-10), and ALDHlow cells (L-3) was assessed. The cells were seeded at 1.0 × 103, 102, 101, and 100 cells/well in an ultra-low attachment plate and cultured for 1 week. Sphere-forming wells were counted. Stem cell frequency was analyzed using the ELDA web site. CI: confidence interval. Differences of the estimated frequencies of CSCs/CICs were analyzed by a Chi-square test. C and D Tumor-forming ability of UM-UC-3 H-10 and L-3 cells. BALB/c-nu/nu mice were injected subcutaneously with 1.0 × 103, 102, 101, and 100 H-10 cells or 1.0 × 104, 103, 102, and 101 L-3 cells. The tumor growth curves of mice injected with 1.0 × 103 H-10 cells and 1.0 × 103 L-3 cells are shown in Fig. 1C. Data are shown as means ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses of the data were performed using a bilateral Student’s t-test. Tumor incidence and estimated CSC/CIC frequency are summarized in Fig. 1D. Stem cell frequency was analyzed using the ELDA web site. CI: confidence interval. Differences of the estimated frequencies of CSCs/CICs were analyzed by a Chi-square test. E and F. Resistance to cisplatin and radiation. H-10 and L-3 cells were treated with cisplatin (CDDP) or radiation at a serial dose, and cell viability was assessed by a WST-8 assay. Data are shown as means ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses for the data were performed using a bilateral Student’s t-test
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Isolation of HLA ligands expressed in bladder CSCs/CICs. A Schematic summary of HLA ligandome analysis. HLA-class 1 molecules were immunoprecipitated using an anti-HLA-A2 antibody (BB7.2), and HLA ligands were isolated by acid treatment. The HLA ligand landscape was analyzed by mass spectrometry. A summary of peptide length is shown in the right panel. UM-UC-3 H-10, L-3, and WT cells were used. B Summary of the antigenic peptides. WebLogo analysis using 9-mer peptides isolated from H-10, L-3, and WT cells is shown. L: leucine; V: valine. C Venn diagram of antigenic peptides. The diagram indicates the number of peptides isolated from H-10, L-3, and WT cells; 848, 1832, and 1073 peptides were isolated from H-10, L-3, and WT cells, respectively, with 123 H-10 cell-specific peptides
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Gene expression analysis of bladder CSCs/CICs. A Heatmap of CAGE. A summary of gene expression using CAGE is shown. WT, L-1, L-3, L-8, H-1, H-6, and H-10 cells were used. B Volcano plot. Gene expression of ALDHhigh clone cells (H-1, H-6, and H-10) and ALDHlow clone cells (L-1, L-3, and L-8) was analyzed by a Volcano plot. Several genes were specifically expressed in ALDHhigh clone cells, and only GRIK2 and CFH (indicated in red) were shared with the ALDHhigh-specific HLA ligandome data. C. Quantitative real-time PCR. Relative quantities of GRIK2 mRNAs in UM-UC3 cells, H-1, H-6, H-10, L-1, L-3 and L-8 cells were analyzed by qRT-PCR. Each value is the mean relative quantity ± SD
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Immunogenicity of a GRIK2-derived antigenic peptide. A Establishment of a GRIK2 peptide-specific CTL clone. PBMCs derived from an HLA-A2-positive donor were stimulated several times with GRIK2 peptide and analyzed by IFNγ ELISPOT and tetramer assays (left panel). GRIK2 peptide-pulsed T2 cells were used for the IFNγ ELISPOT assay. Peptide non-pulsed T2 cells were used as a negative control. For the tetramer assay, PBMCs were stained with phycoerythrin-labeled GRIK2 peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer and analyzed by FACS. The tetramer-positive cells were single cell sorted. Established CTL clones were evaluated by IFNγ ELISPOT and tetramer assays (right panel) for specificity. B GRIK2 peptide-specific CTL clone recognizes endogenously expressed GRIK2. GRIK2 peptide-specific CTL clones were evaluated for reactivity to GRIK2-overexpressing UM-UC-3 cells by an IFNγ ELISPOT assay. K562 cells were used as a negative control. Data are shown as means ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses for the data were performed using a bilateral Student’s t-test. c GRIK2 peptide-specific CTL clone recognizes H-10 clone cells. GRIK2 peptide-specific CTL clones were evaluated for reactivity to H-10, L-3, and WT cells by an IFNγ ELISPOT assay. K562 cells were used as a negative control. Data are shown as means ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses for the data were performed using a bilateral Student’s t-test
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
In vitro immune selection model. A Summary of immune selection model. H-10 clone cells and L-3 clone cells were mixed at a ratio of 1:9. Mixture cells were cultured with (CTL +) or without CTL clone 9G23 (CTL-) for overnight at a effector/target ratio = 5:1 and then cultured for 2 days. Percentages indicate the ALDHhigh-positive rates. B and C Resistance to cisplatin and radiation. CTL + cells and CTL—cells were treated with cisplatin (CDDP) or radiation at a serial dose, and cell viability was assessed by a WST-8 assay. Data are shown as means ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses for the data were performed using a bilateral Student’s t-test

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kamat AM, Hahn NM, Efstathiou JA, et al. Bladder cancer. Lancet. 2016;388:2796–2810. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30512-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Advanced Bladder Cancer (ABC) Meta-analysis Collaboration (2005) Adjuvant chemotherapy in invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data Advanced Bladder Cancer (ABC) Meta-analysis Collaboration. Eur Urol 48:189–199. Discussion 199–201 - PubMed
    1. International Collaboration of Trialists, Medical Research Council Advanced Bladder Cancer Working Party (now the National Cancer Research Institute Bladder Cancer Clinical Studies Group), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Group et al. (2011) International phase III trial assessing neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate, and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of the BA06 30894 trial. J Clin Oncol 29:2171–2177 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel VG, Oh WK, Galsky MD. Treatment of muscle-invasive and advanced bladder cancer in 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:404–423. doi: 10.3322/caac.21631. - DOI - PubMed