Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul-Aug;51(7-8):379-388.
doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000001033.

Effect of Shared Governance on Nurse-Sensitive Indicator and Satisfaction Outcomes by Magnet® Recognition Status

Affiliations

Effect of Shared Governance on Nurse-Sensitive Indicator and Satisfaction Outcomes by Magnet® Recognition Status

Karen Gabel Speroni et al. J Nurs Adm. 2021 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Researchers examined associations between Index for Professional Nursing Governance (IPNG) types and outcomes.

Background: Effects of professional nursing governance on nurse-related outcomes by Magnet® status are not well studied.

Methods: Associations were evaluated between average IPNG scores from 2170 RNs, and nurse-sensitive indicators (NSIs) as well as patient and RN satisfaction outcomes (N = 205 study units; 20 hospitals), following Magnet requirements.

Results: Magnet hospitals had significantly better IPNG shared governance scores than non-Magnet hospitals (Magnet, 106.7; non-Magnet, 101.3). For Magnet hospitals, units scoring as shared governance outperformed traditional governance for 9 of 19 outcomes (47.4%) (NSI, 2; patient satisfaction, 3; RN satisfaction, 4). Self-governance outperformed shared governance for 8 of 15 outcomes (53.3%) (NSI, 2; patient satisfaction, 6; RN satisfaction, 0). For non-Magnet hospitals, shared governance significantly outperformed traditional governance for 1 of 15 outcomes (6.7%) (patient satisfaction).

Conclusions: Having shared or self-governance is a strategy that can be considered by nurse leaders to improve select nurse-related outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. American Nurses Credentialing Center. Magnet Application Manual. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Credentialing Center; 2019.
    1. Hess RG. The Measurement of Professional Governance: Scoring Guidelines And Benchmarks. Hobe Sound, FL: Forum for Shared Governance; 2017.
    1. Hess RG Jr. Measuring nursing governance. Nurs Res. 1998;47(1):35–42.
    1. Kanter RM. Men and Women of the Corporation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1993.
    1. Cicolini G, Comparcini D, Simonetti V. Workplace empowerment and nurses' job satisfaction: a systematic literature review. J Nurs Manag. 2014;22(7):855–871.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources