Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Nov 10;39(32):3574-3582.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01083. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating Radiation Following Surgical Excision for Good-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Long-Term Report From NRG Oncology/RTOG 9804

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating Radiation Following Surgical Excision for Good-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Long-Term Report From NRG Oncology/RTOG 9804

Beryl McCormick et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To our knowledge, NRG/RTOG 9804 is the only randomized trial to assess the impact of whole breast irradiation (radiation therapy [RT]) versus observation (OBS) in women with good-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), following lumpectomy. Long-term results focusing on ipsilateral breast recurrence (IBR), the primary outcome, are presented here.

Patients and methods: Eligible patients underwent lumpectomy for DCIS that was mammogram detected, size ≤ 2.5 cm, final margins ≥ 3 mm, and low or intermediate nuclear grade. Consented patients were randomly assigned to RT or OBS. Tamoxifen use was optional. Cumulative incidence was used to estimate IBR, log-rank test and Gray's test to compare treatments, and Fine-Gray regression for hazard ratios (HRs).

Results: A total of six hundred thirty-six women were randomly assigned from 1999 to 2006. Median age was 58 years and mean pathologic DCIS size was 0.60 cm. Intention to use tamoxifen was balanced between arms (69%); however, actual receipt of tamoxifen varied, 58% RT versus 66% OBS (P = .05). At 13.9 years' median follow-up, the 15-year cumulative incidence of IBR was 7.1% (95% CI, 4.0 to 11.5) with RT versus 15.1% (95% CI, 10.8 to 20.2) OBS (P = .0007; HR = 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.66); and for invasive LR was 5.4% (95% CI, 2.7 to 9.5) RT versus 9.5% (95% CI, 6.0 to 13.9) OBS (P = .027; HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.91). On multivariable analysis, only RT (HR = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.64; P = .0007) and tamoxifen use (HR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.78; P = .0047) were associated with reduced IBR.

Conclusion: RT significantly reduced all and invasive IBR for good-risk DCIS with durable results at 15 years. These results are not an absolute indication for RT but rather should inform shared patient-physician treatment decisions about ipsilateral breast risk reduction in the long term following lumpectomy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00003857.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Beryl McCormickStock and Other Ownership Interests: Varian Medical Systems Henry M. KuererLeadership: American Society of Breast Surgeons, ASCOHonoraria: Genomic HealthConsulting or Advisory Role: Targeted Medical Education Inc, Genomic Health InternationalSpeakers' Bureau: PERPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: NEJM Group, McGraw-Hill Publishing Eileen RakovitchHonoraria: AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Genomic Health International Barbara L. SmithPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Royalty as textbook editor Judith O. HopkinsConsulting or Advisory Role: AIM Specialty Health Lori J. PierceStock and Other Ownership Interests: PFS GenomicsPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: UpToDate, PFS GenomicsUncompensated Relationships: Bristol Myers Squibb, Exact SciencesOpen Payments Link: https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/physician/1250431/summary Kenneth N. M. SumidaEmployment: Hawaii Oncology Inc Danny VespriniHonoraria: MerckConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca Canada Julia R. WhiteResearch Funding: Intraop MedicalNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram. DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
IBR for all randomly assigned patients with follow-up data. HR, hazard ratio; IBR, ipsilateral breast recurrence; OBS, observation; RL, reference level; RT, radiation therapy.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Invasive IBR for all randomly assigned patients with follow-up data. HR, hazard ratio; IBR, ipsilateral breast recurrence; OBS, observation; RL, reference level; RT, radiation therapy.

Comment in

References

    1. Desantis CE, Ma J, Gaudet MM, et al. Breast cancer statistics 2019 CA Cancer J Clin 69438–4512019 - PubMed
    1. Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, et al. Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: Findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17 J Clin Oncol 16441–4521998 - PubMed
    1. Julien J, Bijker N, Fentimen I, et al. Radio-therapy in breast conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: First results of the EORTC randomized phase III trial 10853-EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperatie Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group Lancet 355528–5332000 - PubMed
    1. Emdin S, Granstrand B, Ringberg A, et al. SweDCIS: Radiotherapy after sector resection for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast—Results of a randomized trial in a population offered mammography screening Acta Oncol 45536–5432006 - PubMed
    1. Cuzick J, Sestak I, Pinder SE, et al. Effect of tamoxifen and radiotherapy in women with locally excised ductal carcinoma in situ: Long-term results from the UK/ANZ DCIS trial Lancet Oncol 1221–292011 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data