Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan:105:67-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.08.006. Epub 2021 Aug 15.

Interactions between etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant and 3 antiretroviral regimens

Affiliations

Interactions between etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant and 3 antiretroviral regimens

Regis Kreitchmann et al. Contraception. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Objectives: Long-acting reversible contraceptives are effective contraceptives for women with HIV, but there are limited data on etonogestrel implant and antiretroviral therapy pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. We evaluated etonogestrel/antiretroviral therapy drug-drug interactions, and the effects of etonogestrel on ritonavir-boosted-atazanavir, ritonavir-boosted-lopinavir, and efavirenz pharmacokinetics.

Study design: We enrolled postpartum women using etonogestrel implants and receiving ritonavir-boosted-atazanavir, ritonavir-boosted-lopinavir, or efavirenz-based regimens between 2012 and 2015. Etonogestrel implants were inserted 2 to 12 weeks postpartum. We performed pharmacokinetic sampling pre-etonogestrel insertion and 6 to 7 weeks postinsertion. We measured antiretroviral concentrations pre and postetonogestrel insertion, and compared etonogestrel concentrations between antiretroviral regimens. We considered a minimum serum etonogestrel concentration of 90 pg/mL adequate for ovulation suppression.

Results: We collected pharmacokinetic data for 74 postpartum women, 22 on ritonavir-boosted-atazanavir, 26 on ritonavir-boosted-lopinavir, and 26 on efavirenz. The median serum concentrations of etonogestrel when co-administered were highest with etonogestrel/ritonavir-boosted-atazanavir (604 pg/mL) and etonogestrel/ritonavir-boosted-lopinavir (428 pg/mL), and lowest with etonogestrel/efavirenz (125 pg/mL); p < 0.001. Minimum concentration (Cmin) of ritonavir-boosted-atazanavir and ritonavir-boosted-lopinavir were lower after etonogestrel implant insertion, but overall exposure, predose concentrations, clearance, and half-lives were unchanged. We found no significant change in efavirenz exposure after etonogestrel insertion.

Conclusions: Unlike efavirenz, ritonavir-boosted-atazanavir and ritonavir-boosted-lopinavir were not associated with significant decreases in etonogestrel concentrations. Efavirenz was associated with a significant decrease in etonogestrel concentrations.

Implications: The findings demonstrate no interactions between etonogestrel and ritonavir-boosted-lopinavir or ritonavir-boosted-atazanavir, but confirm the decreased efficacy of etonogestrel with efavirenz-based antiretrovirals. This information should be used to counsel women with HIV who desire long-acting reversible contraceptives.

Keywords: Atazanavir; Efavirenz; Etonogestrel; Long-acting reversible contraceptives; Lopinavir; Pharmacokinetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this work.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Summary of median (interquartile range) atanazavir concentrations before and after etonogestrel implant in postpartum women living with HIV, 2012–2015 (N=74).
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Summary of median (interquartile range) efavirenz concentrations before and after etonogestrel implant in postpartum women living with HIV, 2012–2015 (N=74).
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Summary of median (interquartile range) lopinavir concentrations before and after etonogestrel implant in postpartum women living with HIV, 2012–2015 (N=74).

References

    1. Pitts CJ. Update on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Human Immunodeficiency Virus. The Nursing clinics of North America. 2020;55:417–27. - PubMed
    1. Eke AC, Olagunju A, Best BM, et al. Innovative Approaches for Pharmacology Studies in Pregnant and Lactating Women: A Viewpoint and Lessons from HIV. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020. - PMC - PubMed
    1. UNAIDS. Global HIV & AIDS statistics — 2020 fact sheet. 2020.
    1. Joshi B, Velhal G, Chauhan S, et al. Contraceptive Use and Unintended Pregnancies Among HIV-Infected Women in Mumbai. Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. 2015;40:168–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Polis CB, Bradley SE, Bankole A, Onda T, Croft T, Singh S. Typical-use contraceptive failure rates in 43 countries with Demographic and Health Survey data: summary of a detailed report. Contraception. 2016;94:11–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types