Luteinising hormone-based protocol versus traditional flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with normal ovarian response: study protocol for a non-inferiority trial
- PMID: 34408042
- PMCID: PMC8375742
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047974
Luteinising hormone-based protocol versus traditional flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with normal ovarian response: study protocol for a non-inferiority trial
Abstract
Introduction: Many patients demonstrate an insufficient endogenous luteinising hormone (LH) concentration during ovarian stimulation. With traditional fixed or flexible gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols, antagonist administration may further reduce LH activity. Previously, we proved that LH can be used as an indicator for the timing and dosage of antagonist. Patients with a persistently low LH concentration during ovarian stimulation may not require antagonists, whereas antagonist administration can affect reproductive outcomes. To further explore this hypothesis, we designed a randomised clinical trial to compare the LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol with traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in women with normal ovarian response.
Methods and analysis: This study was a multicentre, parallel, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority study. The primary efficacy endpoint was cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle. The study aimed to prove the non-inferiority of cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle with an LH-based flexible GnRH antagonist protocol versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol. Secondary endpoints were the high-quality embryo rate, clinical pregnancy rate and cancellation rate. Differences in cost-effectiveness and adverse events were evaluated. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle in women with normal ovarian response was 70%. Considering that a non-inferiority threshold should retain 80% of the clinical effect of a control treatment, a minimal clinical difference of 14% (one-sided: α, 2.5%; β, 20%) and a total of 338 patients were needed. Anticipating a 10% drop-out rate, the total number of patients required was 372.
Ethics and dissemination: This trial has been approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Beijing Chao-Yang hospital. All participants in the trial will provide written informed consent. The study will be conducted according to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. Results of this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Trial registration number: ChiCTR1800018077.
Keywords: change management; health economics; sex steroids & HRT.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Luteinizing hormone-based modified GnRH antagonist protocol in normal responders undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: A multi-center randomized controlled trial.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 11;13:922950. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.922950. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36034460 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A novel GnRH antagonist protocol based on LH levels versus traditional flexible GnRH antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial.Trials. 2022 Aug 13;23(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06586-1. Trials. 2022. PMID: 35964041 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Flexible Half-Dose Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Protocol on in vitro Fertilization Outcome in Predicted Normal Responder: A Study Protocol for a Multicentered, Randomized, Non-Inferiority, Parallel Controlled Trial.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023 May 24;17:1557-1566. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S409557. eCollection 2023. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023. PMID: 37249929 Free PMC article.
-
GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF.Hum Reprod Update. 2006 Jul-Aug;12(4):333-40. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dml001. Epub 2006 Mar 27. Hum Reprod Update. 2006. PMID: 16567347 Review.
-
Efficacy of the delayed start antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in Bologna poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;303(2):347-362. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05894-8. Epub 2020 Nov 24. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 33236173
Cited by
-
Luteinizing hormone-based modified GnRH antagonist protocol in normal responders undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: A multi-center randomized controlled trial.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 11;13:922950. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.922950. eCollection 2022. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36034460 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ovarian response determines the luteinizing hormone suppression threshold for patients following the gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist protocol: A retrospective cohort study.Heliyon. 2023 Dec 20;10(1):e23933. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23933. eCollection 2024 Jan 15. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 38187350 Free PMC article.
-
The clinical application value of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist combined with low-dose HCG regimen in patients with ovarian hyper-stimulation based on clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators.Am J Transl Res. 2023 Aug 15;15(8):5477-5485. eCollection 2023. Am J Transl Res. 2023. PMID: 37692927 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hopkisson J. European practice in gynaecology and obstetrics: ovulation induction. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist 2005;7:66. 10.1576/toag.7.1.066.27047 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources