Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 34408058
- PMCID: PMC8375732
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052212
Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be a significant health burden, most commonly affecting the lungs and referred to as pulmonary TB (PTB). Diagnostic techniques of PTB primarily rely on expectorated sputum samples. However, the diagnostic yields are often hindered due to insufficient volume and quality of the sputum specimens. Moreover, some individuals are unable to provide sputum samples due to scanty sputum production or difficulty in coughing up and require an invasive procedure to obtain a respiratory sample, such as bronchoscopic or gastric aspiration. Thus, challenges in the acquisition of respiratory specimens warrant an alternate specimen. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a stool specimen for the diagnosis of PTB in adults.
Methods and analysis: We will search MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science and Cochrane database from inception to April 2021 using a comprehensive search strategy. Two reviewers will independently perform screening, data extraction and quality assessment. The risk of bias assessment and applicability of results of eligible studies will be performed using the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Bivariate random-effects models will be performed to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio along with 95% CI of stool specimen for each reported diagnostic method against any of the reference standard test (ie, mycobacterial culture or smear microscopy or Xpert assay using respiratory specimens). Heterogeneity between studies will be assessed by I2 statistics and Q statistic of the χ2 test.
Ethics and dissemination: The results will be disseminated through publishing in a peer-reviewed medical journal and public presentations in relevant national and international conferences. As this is a systematic review of publicly available data, ethics approval is not required.
Prospero registration number: CRD42021245203.
Keywords: bacteriology; diagnostic microbiology; molecular diagnostics; tuberculosis.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 27;13(4):e062135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062135. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37105702 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in stool samples of adults with pulmonary tuberculosis.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 13;13(9):e0203063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203063. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30212505 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of Xpert in tuberculosis diagnosis based on various specimens: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 May 2;13:1149741. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1149741. eCollection 2023. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37201118 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Stool Xpert MTB/RIF for Detection of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Children: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Clin Microbiol. 2019 May 24;57(6):e02057-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02057-18. Print 2019 Jun. J Clin Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 30944200 Free PMC article.
-
Use of GeneXpert MTB/RIF on a single pooled sputum specimen to exclude pulmonary tuberculosis among hospital inpatients placed in respiratory isolation.Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Mar;92:175-180. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.12.024. Epub 2019 Dec 24. Int J Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 31881274
Cited by
-
Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Assay Using Stool: an Effective Solution for Bacilli Identification from Adult Pulmonary Tuberculosis Suspects without Expectorated Sputum.Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Aug 17;11(4):e0126523. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01265-23. Epub 2023 Jun 28. Microbiol Spectr. 2023. PMID: 37378554 Free PMC article.
-
Wastewater-based surveillance as a tool for public health action: SARS-CoV-2 and beyond.Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Mar 14;37(1):e0010322. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00103-22. Epub 2023 Dec 14. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024. PMID: 38095438 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Performance of stool-based Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis in adults unable to expectorate sputum.Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Apr;13(4):e0249524. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02495-24. Epub 2025 Feb 25. Microbiol Spectr. 2025. PMID: 39998336 Free PMC article.
-
Drug Resistance and Molecular Characteristics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: A Single Center Experience.J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 19;12(12):2088. doi: 10.3390/jpm12122088. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 36556308 Free PMC article.
-
Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 27;13(4):e062135. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062135. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37105702 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bloom BR, Atun R, Cohen T. Tuberculosis. In: Holmes KK, Bertozzi S, Bloom BR, eds. Major infectious diseases. Washington (DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank © 2017 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, 2017.
-
- World health statistics 2021: a visual summary: World Health organization, 2021. Available: https://www.who.int/data/stories/world-health-statistics-2021-a-visual-s... [Accessed 17 Jun 2021].
-
- WHO . Global tuberculosis report 2020. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2020.
-
- Sharma SK, Mohan A, Kohli M. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Expert Rev Respir Med 2021. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous