Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug 14:13:17588359211039052.
doi: 10.1177/17588359211039052. eCollection 2021.

Novel and emerging approaches in the management of non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma

Affiliations
Review

Novel and emerging approaches in the management of non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma

Omid Yassaie et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. .

Abstract

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has traditionally been managed with transurethral resection followed by intravesical chemotherapy and/or bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) in a risk-adapted manner. These tumors commonly recur and can progress potentially to lethal muscle invasive disease. A major unmet need in the field of NMIBC is bladder preserving therapy for recurrent high-grade NMIBC after adequate intravesical BCG therapy. The current gold standard treatment for these BCG-unresponsive patients is radical cystectomy, which is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, particularly in older and frailer patients. It is therefore critical to provide alternative treatment options with acceptable oncological outcomes. In this review we explore novel bladder-sparing treatment options including combination intravesical therapy, enhanced instillation methods, immunotherapy, gene therapy, targeted therapy, photodynamic therapy and BCG variants across the spectrum of NMIBC disease states, ranging from low grade BCG-naïve patients through to high-grade BCG-unresponsive NMIBC.

Keywords: BCG-unresponsive bladder cancer; immunotherapy; intravesical BCG; intravesical chemotherapy; non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; novel therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Disease states in high risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer based on prior BCG therapy

References

    1. Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 234–241. - PubMed
    1. Babjuk M, Burger M, Compérat EM, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ) – 2019 update. Eur Urol 2019; 76: 639–657. - PubMed
    1. Sylvester RJ, Van Der Meijden AP, Witjes JA, et al. Bacillus Calmette–Guerin versus chemotherapy for the intravesical treatment of patients with carcinoma in situ of the bladder: a meta-analysis of the published results of randomized clinical trials. J Urol 2005; 174: 86–91. - PubMed
    1. Redelman-Sidi G, Glickman MS, Bochner BH.The mechanism of action of BCG therapy for bladder cancer – a current perspective. Nat Rev Urol 2014; 11: 153–162. - PubMed
    1. Witjes JA.Management of BCG failures in superficial bladder cancer: a review. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 790–797. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources