Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 7;66(Suppl 1):i202-i217.
doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxab056.

Estimation of Airborne Vapor Concentrations of Oil Dispersants COREXIT™ EC9527A and EC9500A, Volatile Components Associated with the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Response and Clean-up Operations

Affiliations

Estimation of Airborne Vapor Concentrations of Oil Dispersants COREXIT™ EC9527A and EC9500A, Volatile Components Associated with the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Response and Clean-up Operations

Mark R Stenzel et al. Ann Work Expo Health. .

Erratum in

Abstract

The Deepwater Horizon (DWH) drilling unit explosion above the Macondo oil well on 20 April 2010 caused the release of approximately 4.9 million barrels (779 million L) of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. As part of a larger spill response and clean-up effort, approximately 1.84 million gallons (6.81 million L) of chemical dispersants COREXIT™ EC9500A and COREXIT™ EC9527A were applied to the resultant oil slicks through spraying on the water surface by plane and by vessel and through injection at the release source near the seabed. The GuLF STUDY is investigating the health effects of workers involved in the oil spill response and clean-up after the DWH explosion, and estimates of possible exposure to chemical dispersants were needed. Exposures were estimated to the volatile components of COREXIT™ EC9500A [petroleum distillates, hydrotreated light, and propylene glycol (PG)] and of COREXIT™ EC9527A [2-butoxyethanol (2-BE) and PG] using two of AIHA IHMOD2.0© mathematical modeling tools along with the dispersants' chemical and physical properties. Monte Carlo simulations were used to reflect uncertainty in input parameters with both the two-box, constant emission model and the near and mid field plume model for indoor and outdoor activities, respectively. Possible exposure scenarios considered various evaporation rates, sizes of the dispersant pool, wind speeds, and ventilation rates. For the two-box model, mean near field exposure estimates to 2-BE ranged from 0.9 to 5.7 ppm, while mean far field estimated exposures ranged from 0.3 to 3.5 ppm. Estimates of mean near field plume model exposures ranged from 0.01 to 3.7 ppm at 2.5 ft from the source, and <0.01 to 0.3 ppm at 10 ft from the source. Estimated exposures to PG were approximately 10% of the calculated 2-BE exposures and exposures to petroleum distillates about 40% higher than the 2-BE estimates. Results indicate that compared with current occupational exposure guidelines, overexposure to petroleum distillates and PG probably did not occur in our study, but under some conditions, for short periods, exposure to 2-BE may have exceeded the limits for peak exposures. These estimates were developed for use in job-exposure matrices to estimate exposures of workers having contact with dispersant vapors for the GuLF STUDY.

Keywords: Deepwater Horizon; dispersants; mathematical exposure modeling; oil spill.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists . (2019) Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents & biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH®.
    1. American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) . (2004) Workplace Environmental Exposure Levels (WEELs®), propylene glycol (CAS No. 57-55-6). Available at https://www.tera.org/OARS/WEELs.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2021.
    1. Armstrong TW. (2009) Air dispersion plume models. In Simmons CE, Keil CB, Anthony TR, editors. Mathematical models for estimating occupational exposures to chemicals. Fairfax, VA: AIHA Press.
    1. Arnold SF, Shao Y, Ramachandran G. (2017a) Evaluation of the well mixed room and near-field far-field models in occupational settings. J Occup Environ Hyg; 14: 694–702. - PubMed
    1. Arnold SF, Shao Y, Ramachandran G. (2017b). Evaluating well-mixed room and near-field–far-field model performance under highly controlled conditions. J Occup Environ Hyg; 14: 427–37. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types