Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;142(5):859-871.
doi: 10.1007/s00401-021-02358-4. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

Subgroup and subtype-specific outcomes in adult medulloblastoma

Affiliations

Subgroup and subtype-specific outcomes in adult medulloblastoma

Hallie Coltin et al. Acta Neuropathol. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Medulloblastoma, a common pediatric malignant central nervous system tumour, represent a small proportion of brain tumours in adults. Previously it has been shown that in adults, Sonic Hedgehog (SHH)-activated tumours predominate, with Wingless-type (WNT) and Group 4 being less common, but molecular risk stratification remains a challenge. We performed an integrated analysis consisting of genome-wide methylation profiling, copy number profiling, somatic nucleotide variants and correlation of clinical variables across a cohort of 191 adult medulloblastoma cases identified through the Medulloblastoma Advanced Genomics International Consortium. We identified 30 WNT, 112 SHH, 6 Group 3, and 41 Group 4 tumours. Patients with SHH tumours were significantly older at diagnosis compared to other subgroups (p < 0.0001). Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) for WNT, SHH, Group 3, and Group 4 tumours was 64.4 (48.0-86.5), 61.9% (51.6-74.2), 80.0% (95% CI 51.6-100.0), and 44.9% (95% CI 28.6-70.7), respectively (p = 0.06). None of the clinical variables (age, sex, metastatic status, extent of resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) were associated with subgroup-specific PFS. Survival among patients with SHH tumours was significantly worse for cases with chromosome 3p loss (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.6; p = 0.02), chromosome 10q loss (HR 4.6, 95% CI 2.3-9.4; p < 0.0001), chromosome 17p loss (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.8; p = 0.02), and PTCH1 mutations (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.2; p = 0.04). The prognostic significance of 3p loss and 10q loss persisted in multivariable regression models. For Group 4 tumours, chromosome 8 loss was strongly associated with improved survival, which was validated in a non-overlapping cohort (combined cohort HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.7; p = 0.007). Unlike in pediatric medulloblastoma, whole chromosome 11 loss in Group 4 and chromosome 14q loss in SHH was not associated with improved survival, where MYCN, GLI2 and MYC amplification were rare. In sum, we report unique subgroup-specific cytogenetic features of adult medulloblastoma, which are distinct from those in younger patients, and correlate with survival disparities. Our findings suggest that clinical trials that incorporate new strategies tailored to high-risk adult medulloblastoma patients are urgently needed.

Keywords: Adult; DNA methylation profiling; Medulloblastoma; Molecular groups; Risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Clinical and cytogenetic landscape of adult medulloblastoma. a Oncoprint depicting clinical characteristics, chromosomal aberrations and gene mutations of cohort. b Two-dimensional t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) plot demonstrating subtypes with reference cohort (Northcott et al. 2017). c) Age distribution by subgroup (n = 189)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Oncoprint depicting clinical characteristics, chromosomal aberrations, and gene mutations of SHH-activated medulloblastoma (n = 112)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Survival analysis of adult medulloblastoma. Kaplan–Meier progression-free survival analysis of a Cohort by subgroup b 10q loss in adult SHH c 17p loss in adult SHH d) Chromosome 8 loss in Group 4 tumours. p value determined using the log-rank method

References

    1. Baroni LV, Sampor C, Gonzalez A, Lubieniecki F, Lamas G, Rugilo C et al. (2020) Bridging the treatment gap in infant medulloblastoma: molecularly informed outcomes of a globally feasible regimen. Neuro Oncol 22:1873–1881. 10.1093/neuonc/noaa122 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beier D, Proescholdt M, Reinert C, Pietsch T, Jones DTW, Pfister SM et al. (2018) Multicenter pilot study of radiochemotherapy as first-line treatment for adults with medulloblastoma (NOA-07). Neuro Oncol 20:400–410. 10.1093/neuonc/nox155 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brandes AA, Ermani M, Amista P, Basso U, Vastola F, Gardiman M et al. (2003) The treatment of adults with medulloblastoma: a prospective study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:755–761. 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00643-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brandes AA, Franceschi E, Tosoni A, Blatt V, Ermani M (2007) Long-term results of a prospective study on the treatment of medulloblastoma in adults. Cancer 110:2035–2041. 10.1002/cncr.23003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Capper D, Jones DTW, Sill M, Hovestadt V, Schrimpf D, Sturm D et al. (2018) DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours. Nature 555:469–474. 10.1038/nature26000 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances