Assessment of Textbook Outcome After Surgery for Stage I/II Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- PMID: 34411699
- PMCID: PMC8848000
- DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.08.009
Assessment of Textbook Outcome After Surgery for Stage I/II Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Abstract
Outcomes after cancer resection are traditionally measured individually. Composite metrics, or textbook outcomes, bundle outcomes into a single value to facilitate assessments of quality. We propose a composite outcome for non-small cell lung cancer resections, examine factors associated with the outcome, and evaluate its effect on overall survival. We queried the National Cancer Database for patients with stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer who underwent sublobar resection, lobectomy, or pneumonectomy from 2010 to 2016. We defined the metric as margin-negative resection, sampling of ≥10 lymph nodes, length of stay <75th percentile, no 30-day mortality, no readmission, and receipt of indicated adjuvant therapy. Multivariable logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards modeling, survival analyses, and propensity score matching were used to identify factors associated with the outcome and overall survival. Of 88,208 patients, 70,149 underwent lobectomy, 14,922 underwent sublobar resection, and 3,137 underwent pneumonectomy. Textbook outcome was achieved in 26.3% of patients. Failure to achieve the outcome was most commonly driven by inadequate nodal assessment. Textbook outcome was more likely after minimally invasive surgical approaches (aOR = 1.47; P< 0.001) relative to open resection and less likely after sublobar resection (aOR = 0.20; P< 0.001) relative to lobectomy. Achievement of textbook outcome was associated with an 9.6% increase in 5-year survival (P< 0.001), was independently associated with improved survival (aHR = 0.72; P < 0.001), and remained strongly associated with survival independent of resection extent after propensity matching. One in 4 patients undergoing non-small cell lung cancer resection achieve textbook outcome. Textbook outcome is associated with improved survival and has value as a quality metric.
Keywords: non-small cell lung cancer; quality; textbook outcome.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures





Comment in
-
Commentary: Quality vs. conformity.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Winter;34(4):1360-1361. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.08.020. Epub 2021 Aug 29. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 34469798 No abstract available.
-
Commentary: Using the National Cancer Database to Create a Surgical Outcomes Composite Index. Is this Textbook or Cliffs Notes?Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Winter;34(4):1362-1363. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2021.08.022. Epub 2021 Sep 1. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 34481045 No abstract available.
References
-
- Fong Y Textbook Outcome Nomograms as Multivariate Clinical Tools for Building Cancer Treatment Pathways and Prognosticating Outcomes. JAMA Surgery. 2019;154:e190572–e190572. - PubMed
-
- Dimick JB, Staiger DO, Baser O, Birkmeyer JD. Composite measures for predicting surgical mortality in the hospital. Health Affairs. 2009;28:1189–1198. - PubMed
-
- Kolfschoten NE, Kievit J, Gooiker GA, et al. Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; hospital variations in ‘textbook outcome’. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:156–163. - PubMed
-
- van der Kaaij RT, de Rooij MV, van Coevorden F, et al. Using textbook outcome as a measure of quality of care in oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2018;105:561–569. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical