Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2021 Dec;103-B(12):1821-1830.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B.BJJ-2020-2321.R2. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

Development of the CORE-Kids core set of outcome domains for studies of childhood limb fractures

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Development of the CORE-Kids core set of outcome domains for studies of childhood limb fractures

Ben A Marson et al. Bone Joint J. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to develop a core set of outcome domains that should be considered and reported in all future trials of childhood limb fractures.

Methods: A four-phase study was conducted to agree a set of core outcome domains. Identification of candidate outcome domains were identified through systematic review of trials, and outcome domains relevant to families were identified through semi-structured interviews with 20 families (parent-child pairing or group). Outcome domains were prioritized using an international three-round Delphi survey with 205 panellists and then condensed into a core outcome set through a consensus workshop with 30 stakeholders.

Results: The systematic review and interviews identified 85 outcome domains as relevant to professionals or families. The Delphi survey prioritized 30 upper and 29 lower limb outcome domains at first round, an additional 17 upper and 18 lower limb outcomes at second round, and four additional outcomes for upper and lower limb at the third round as important domains. At the consensus workshop, the core outcome domains were agreed as: 1) pain and discomfort; 2) return to physical and recreational activities; 3) emotional and psychosocial wellbeing; 4) complications from the injury and treatment; 5) rturn to baseline activities daily living; 6) participation in learning; 7) appearance and deformity; and 8) time to union. In addition, 9a) recovery of mobility and 9b) recovery of manual dexterity was recommended as a core outcome for lower and upper limb fractures, respectively.

Conclusion: This set of core outcome domains is recommended as a minimum set of outcomes to be reported in all trials. It is not an exhaustive set and further work is required to identify what outcome tools should be used to measure each of these outcomes. Adoption of this outcome set will improve the consistency of research for these children that can be combined for more meaningful meta-analyses and policy development. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(12):1821-1830.

Keywords: Bone; Core outcome set; Fracture; Lower extremity; Lower limb; Orthopaedic Surgeons; Outcome; Paediatric Orthopaedic; Upper extremity; Upper limb; clinical outcomes; deformity; limb fractures; lower limb fractures; paediatric orthopaedic surgeons; upper limb fractures.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of outcome domains considered for inclusion in the core set of outcome domains.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Voting outcomes from consensus workshop identifying the general core outcome set for children’s fractures and the upper and lower limb modules, ordered left to right by percentage voting for the score to be included in the general set of core outcome domains.

References

    1. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374(9683):86–89. - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JPA, Greenland S, Hlatky MA, et al. Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):166–175. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kirkham JJ, Gargon E, Clarke M, Williamson PR. Can a core outcome set improve the quality of systematic reviews?--a survey of the co-ordinating editors of Cochrane Review Groups. Trials. 2013;14(1):21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clarke M, Williamson PR. Core outcome sets and systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prinsen CAC, Vohra S, Rose MR, et al. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” - a practical guideline. Trials. 2016;17(1):449. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types