Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 18;14(8):1281-1284.
doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.08.21. eCollection 2021.

Does offering only the spherical contact lens trial to the low astigmats mislead the practitioners?

Monica Chaudhry  1   2 , Surendra Prasad Sah  1   3 , Indra Prasad Sharma  1   4 , Soujanya Mondal  1   5
Affiliations

Does offering only the spherical contact lens trial to the low astigmats mislead the practitioners?

Monica Chaudhry et al. Int J Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Aim: To compare the visual acuity (VA), comfort, and patient preference in a soft toric contact lens (TCL) versus soft spherical contact lens (SCL) in low astigmatic subjects during the contact lens (CL) trial.

Methods: This subject-masked, block randomized, 2×2 crossover study recruited 40 neophyte subjects (80 eyes) aged 18 to 33y with astigmatism in the range of 0.75-1.25 D with or without spherical power from -6.00 D to +6.00 D. The participants were scheduled for two days CL trial and were fitted with the best-fit SCL and TCL. After 4h of wear, they were assessed objectively for high contrast VA and subjective vision, comfort, and preference.

Results: The responses of 36 subjects (response rate 90%) with a mean age of 23.02±2.97y (range 18 to 33y) were analyzed. One-line improvement of monocular VA in the logMAR chart was reported to TCL as compared to SCL (-0.044±0.06 vs 0.04±0.03 logMAR, P=0.01) but the binocular vision remained similar (-0.12±0.07 vs -0.14±0.04 logMAR, P=0.38). Subjects felt a noticeable difference in clarity when shifted to TCL as compared to the SCL. The satisfaction with vision (vision quality) was significantly better with TCL (P=0.03). The fatigue with TCL was graded less at 2.5±0.6, compared to SCL at 4.6±1.3 (P=0.04). Thirty-three participants (91.6%) preferred to use contact lens of which 26 participants (79%) preferred TCL.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that VA and comfort are better with TCL as compared to SCL which is only observed if the patient was offered both offering SCL with spherical equivalent power alone as the first option can mislead the practitioner; TCL trial should be the first choice of the lens in low-to-moderate astigmatism.

Keywords: astigmatism; comfort; spherical contact lens; toric contact lens; visual acuity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Subject-reported responses rated for visual acuity
A: Responses on vision quantity; B: Responses on vision quality.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Subjective response on comfort with SCL and TCL.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Young G, Sulley A, Hunt C. Prevalence of astigmatism in relation to soft contact lens fitting. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37(1):20–25. - PubMed
    1. Morgan PB, Efron N, Woods CA, International Contact Lens Prescribing Survey Consortium An international survey of toric contact lens prescribing. Eye Contact Lens. 2013;39(2):132–137. - PubMed
    1. Hashemi H, Fotouhi A, Yekta A, Pakzad R, Ostadimoghaddam H, Khabazkhoob M. Global and regional estimates of prevalence of refractive errors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018;30(1):3–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sulley A, Young G, Lorenz KO, Hunt C. Clinical evaluation of fitting toric soft contact lenses to current non-users. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;33(2):94–103. - PubMed
    1. Richdale K, Berntsen DA, Mack CJ, Merchea MM, Barr JT. Visual acuity with spherical and toric soft contact lenses in low-to moderate-astigmatic eyes. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(10):969–975. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources