Adult spinal deformity surgery: posterior three-column osteotomies vs anterior lordotic cages with posterior fusion. Complications, clinical and radiological results. A systematic review of the literature
- PMID: 34415448
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06925-x
Adult spinal deformity surgery: posterior three-column osteotomies vs anterior lordotic cages with posterior fusion. Complications, clinical and radiological results. A systematic review of the literature
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of our study is to analyse mid- to long-term severe adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery outcomes by comparing three-column osteotomies (3CO) and multiple anterior interbody fusion cages (AC).
Materials and methods: The PRISMA flowchart was used to systematically review the literature. Only articles with a minimum 24-month follow-up were examined, and 11 articles were included. The following radiological parameters were observed: pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), Cobb angle and T1-sacrum plumbline. Clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores. The main complications were analysed, and the two groups were compared.
Results: Except for age, the two populations were homogeneous. Both techniques had the same number of posterior instrumented levels (7.4 ± 1.7). The AC group had a mean 3 ± 1.4 interbody fusions per patient. In the PSO group, all patients had 1 3CO and 89.8% of the osteotomies were performed at L2 or L3 vertebrae. No difference was observed between the two groups in terms of clinical outcomes. Both techniques were effective in sagittal parameters restoration with a final PI-LL mismatch = 4.4°. The PSO group had a statistically higher rate of intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.036), major complications, pseudoarthrosis and dural tears (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Both PSO and multiple AC are effective in treating ASD. Multiple AC seems more suitable when treating older patients because of a lower intraoperative blood loss, lower rate of major complications and fewer number of revision surgeries.
Keywords: 3-column osteotomy; Adult spinal deformity; Anterior intersomatic cages; Pedicle subtraction osteotomy; Sagittal alignment.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A (2019) Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 28(9):1889–1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I, Kleinstück F, Pérez-Grueso FJS, Acaroglu E, Haddad S, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A (2017) European spine study group (ESSG) global alignment and proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Jt Surg Am 99(19):1661–1672. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01594 - DOI
-
- Obeid I, Berjano P, Lamartina C, Chopin D, Boissière L, Bourghli A (2019) Classification of coronal imbalance in adult scoliosis and spine deformity a treatment-oriented guideline. Eur Spine J Jan 28(1):94–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5826-3 - DOI
-
- Le Huec JC, Faundez A, Dominguez D, Hoffmeyer P, Aunoble S (2014) Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal disease: a literature review. Int Orthopaedics 39(1):87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2516-6 - DOI
-
- Laouissat F, Sebaaly A, Gehrchen M, Roussouly P (2018) Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the roussouly classification. Eur Spine J 27:2002–2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5111-x - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous