New thin-film adhesive for sealing full-thickness corneal incisions in rabbits
- PMID: 34415863
- PMCID: PMC8868184
- DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000751
New thin-film adhesive for sealing full-thickness corneal incisions in rabbits
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the repair of penetrating corneal incisions in an in vivo rabbit model using a laser-activated thin-film adhesive, sutures, or self-seal.
Setting: The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.
Design: Animal studies.
Methods: Under an operating microscope, 2.0 mm penetrating incisions were created in 162 right eyes. Incisions in one group were repaired with the adhesive, the second group received a single 10-0 nylon suture, and the third group was left to self-seal. Rabbits were killed humanely at predetermined timepoints over 2 weeks, and wound healing was assessed using burst pressure and immunohistological studies. A modified McDonald-Shadduck scoring was used to assess eyes.
Results: The mean burst pressure of the adhesive group was significantly higher than the sutured or self-sealed groups at all timepoints within the first 72 hours. At 0 hour, the burst pressure was 98.0 (±17.0) mm Hg, 30.6 (±2.1) mm Hg, and 3.8 (±0.6) mm Hg (P < .00001) for adhesive-treated (n = 5), sutured (n = 5), and self-sealed wounds (n = 5), respectively. These increased to 229.0 (±53.7) mm Hg, 12.4 (±2.9) mm Hg, and 27.3 (±4.0) mm Hg (P = .0011) at 72 hours. The modified McDonald-Shadduck score was significantly higher for eyes repaired using the adhesive than those sutured or left to self-seal for the first 72 hours. On histology and immunofluorescence, adhesive treatment demonstrated better wound approximation and higher myofibroblastic activation than the other groups.
Conclusions: The adhesive was efficacious in sealing penetrating corneal incisions and tolerated higher burst pressures than sutures or self-seal. The adhesive was biocompatible in rabbits, and incisions demonstrated a rapid gain in wound strength that sustained over the study period.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.
Figures






Comment in
-
Comment on: New thin-film adhesive for sealing full-thickness corneal incisions in rabbits.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Oct 1;48(10):1223. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001026. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022. PMID: 36026710 No abstract available.
References
-
- Francis IC, Roufas A, Figueira EC, Pandya VB, Bhardwaj G, Chui J. Endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: the sucking corneal wound. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:1643–1645 - PubMed
-
- West ES, Behrens A, McDonnell PJ, Tielsch JM, Schein OD. The incidence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery among the U.S. Medicare population increased between 1994 and 2001. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1388–1394 - PubMed
-
- Fine IH. Clear corneal incisions. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1994;34:59–72 - PubMed
-
- Leaming DV. Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members—2003 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:892–900 - PubMed
-
- Wallin T, Parker J, Jin Y, Kefalopoulos G, Olson RJ. Cohort study of 27 cases of endophthalmitis at a single institution. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:735–741 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources