Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 20;9(8).
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00231.

Isolated Arthroscopic-Assisted Subtalar Fusion: A Systematic Review

Allison Loewen  1 , Susan M Ge  2 , Yousef Marwan  2 , Gregory K Berry  2
Affiliations

Isolated Arthroscopic-Assisted Subtalar Fusion: A Systematic Review

Allison Loewen et al. JBJS Rev. .

Abstract

Background: The subtalar joint has a complex anatomic function that includes inversion and eversion of the hindfoot, assisting in walking on uneven surfaces. Arthritis is the most common pathological condition affecting this joint and can require fusion. The surgery can be performed open or with arthroscopic assistance. This systematic review assesses articles written on the safety and efficacy of isolated arthroscopic subtalar fusion.

Methods: Using MEDLINE and Embase, we systematically reviewed articles published before May 21, 2020.

Results: Of 395 articles, 17 on a total of 395 patients (409 operations) were included in the review. The average duration of follow-up was 40.0 months (range, 3 to 105 months). Radiographic evidence of union was reported for 95.8% of cases at an average of 11.9 weeks (range, 6 to 56 weeks) postoperatively. Delayed union was reported in 1.0% of patients and nonunion, in 4.3% of patients. In the articles reporting patient satisfaction, including pain relief, 95.4% of patients had positive outcomes. Postoperative complications were reported in 64 patients (16.2%), including 37 (9.4%) with symptomatic implants, 11 (2.8%) with dysesthesia or neuropathic pain, and 3 (0.8%) with postoperative infection.

Conclusions: Arthroscopic subtalar fusion is a safe and effective alternative to open subtalar arthrodesis, with high patient satisfaction rates, high union rates at similar follow-up intervals, and low complication rates. The aim of future research should be to determine the ideal cases for this approach as well as the most efficient arthroscopic surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation to optimize function and union as seen on radiographs.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/A729).

References

    1. Keefe DT, Haddad SL. Subtalar instability. Etiology, diagnosis, and management. Foot Ankle Clin. 2002 Sep;7(3):577-609.
    1. Ball P, Johnson GR. Technique for the measurement of hindfoot inversion and eversion and its use to study a normal population. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996 Apr;11(3):165-9.
    1. Vulcano E, Ellington JK, Myerson MS. The spectrum of indications for subtalar joint arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Clin. 2015 Jun;20(2):293-310. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
    1. Waldman SD. Atlas of uncommon pain syndromes. 3rd ed. W.B. Saunders; 2014. Subtalar joint pain; p 324-6.
    1. Roster B, Kreulen C, Giza E. Subtalar joint arthrodesis: open and arthroscopic indications and surgical techniques. Foot Ankle Clin. 2015 Jun;20(2):319-34. Epub 2015 Apr 11.

Publication types