Use of an artificial intelligence-based rule extraction approach to predict an emergency cesarean section
- PMID: 34416018
- PMCID: PMC9290872
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13888
Use of an artificial intelligence-based rule extraction approach to predict an emergency cesarean section
Abstract
Objective: One of the major problems with artificial intelligence (AI) is that it is generally known as a "black box". Therefore, the present study aimed to construct an emergency cesarean section (CS) prediction system using an AI-based rule extraction approach as a "white box" to detect the cause for the emergency CS.
Methods: Data were collected from all perinatal records of all delivery outcomes at Osaka Medical College between December 2014 and July 2019. We identified the delivery method for all deliveries after 36 gestational weeks as either (1) vaginal delivery or scheduled CS, or (2) emergency CS. From among these, we selected 52 risk factors to feed into an AI-based rule extraction algorithm to extract rules to predict an emergency CS.
Results: We identified 1513 singleton deliveries (1285 [84.9%] vaginal deliveries, 228 emergency CS [15.1%]) and extracted 15 rules. We achieved an average accuracy of 81.90% using five-fold cross-validation and an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of 71.46%.
Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to use interpretable AI-based rule extraction technology to predict an emergency CS. This system appears to be useful for identifying hidden factors for emergency CS.
Keywords: artificial intelligence; delivery; emergency cesarean section; predictive decision system; rule extraction.
© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
A Comparative Study of the Spontaneous Labor Rate in Scheduled Elective Cesarean Section at 38 Weeks versus 39 Weeks of Gestation in Parturient with Previous Cesarean Section.J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Jul;99 Suppl 4:S37-41. J Med Assoc Thai. 2016. PMID: 29916674
-
Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Aug 17;16:230. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1028-3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 27535233 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors predicting an emergency cesarean delivery for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Sep;292(3):531-6. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3667-4. Epub 2015 Feb 26. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015. PMID: 25716669
-
Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009. Semin Perinatol. 2006. PMID: 17011400 Review.
-
Management of twins: vaginal or cesarean delivery?Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jun;58(2):294-308. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000105. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015. PMID: 25851847 Review.
References
-
- World Health Organization . Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2:436‐437. - PubMed
-
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare . Survey of Medical Institutions , 2017. (In Japanese). Available from URL: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/list/79‐1.html. December 27, 2018.
-
- Darnal N, Dangal G. Maternal and fetal outcome in emergency versus elective caesarean section. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020;18(2):186‐189. - PubMed
-
- Al Housseini A, Newman T, Cox A, Devoe LD. Prediction of risk for cesarean delivery in term nulliparas: a comparison of neural network and multiple logistic regression models. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):113 e1–6. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical