Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Sep 2;108(9):1780-1791.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Aug 19.

Robust genetic nurture effects on education: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 38,654 families across 8 cohorts

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Robust genetic nurture effects on education: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 38,654 families across 8 cohorts

Biyao Wang et al. Am J Hum Genet. .

Abstract

Similarities between parents and offspring arise from nature and nurture. Beyond this simple dichotomy, recent genomic studies have uncovered "genetic nurture" effects, whereby parental genotypes influence offspring outcomes via environmental pathways rather than genetic transmission. Such genetic nurture effects also need to be accounted for to accurately estimate "direct" genetic effects (i.e., genetic effects on a trait originating in the offspring). Empirical studies have indicated that genetic nurture effects are particularly relevant to the intergenerational transmission of risk for child educational outcomes, which are, in turn, associated with major psychological and health milestones throughout the life course. These findings have yet to be systematically appraised across contexts. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify genetic nurture effects on educational outcomes. A total of 12 studies comprising 38,654 distinct parent(s)-offspring pairs or trios from 8 cohorts reported 22 estimates of genetic nurture effects. Genetic nurture effects on offspring's educational outcomes (βgenetic nurture = 0.08, 95% CI [0.07, 0.09]) were smaller than direct genetic effects (βdirect genetic = 0.17, 95% CI [0.13, 0.20]). Findings were largely consistent across studies. Genetic nurture effects originating from mothers and fathers were of similar magnitude, highlighting the need for a greater inclusion of fathers in educational research. Genetic nurture effects were largely explained by observed parental education and socioeconomic status, pointing to their role in environmental pathways shaping child educational outcomes. Findings provide consistent evidence that environmentally mediated parental genetic influences contribute to the intergenerational transmission of educational outcomes, in addition to effects due to genetic transmission.

Keywords: educational achievement; educational attainment; genetic nurture; intergenerational transmission; meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of identification of eligible studies
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of multilevel random effects model for genetic nurture effects and direct genetic effects on educational outcomes Effect sizes were standardized beta coefficients, which represent how many standard deviations of change in educational outcome occur per standard deviation of change in EA PGS.

References

    1. Conti G., Heckman J., Urzua S. The education-health gradient. Am. Econ. Rev. 2010;100:234–238. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schoeni R.F., House J.S., Kaplan G.A., Pollack H.A. Russell Sage Foundation; 2008. Making Americans healthier: Social and economic policy as health policy.
    1. Crespo L., López-Noval B., Mira P. Compulsory schooling, education, depression and memory: New evidence from SHARELIFE. Econ. Educ. Rev. 2014;43:36–46.
    1. Dubow E.F., Boxer P., Huesmann L.R. Long-term effects of parents’ education on children’s educational and occupational success: Mediation by family interactions, child aggression, and teenage aspirations. Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press) 2009;55:224–249. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Björklund A., Salvanes K.G. In: Hanushek E.A., Machin S., Woessmann L., editors. Elsevier; 2011. Education and Family Background: Mechanisms and Policies; pp. 201–247. (Handbook of the Economics of Education, Volume 3, Chapter 3).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources