Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Sep;48(3):449-466.
doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.05.002.

Stress Urinary Incontinence: Slings, Single-Incision Slings, and Nonmesh Approaches

Affiliations
Review

Stress Urinary Incontinence: Slings, Single-Incision Slings, and Nonmesh Approaches

Lauren Caldwell et al. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Synthetic midurethral slings offer optimal cure rates for the minimally invasive treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Performed via a retropubic or transobturator technique, midurethral sling approaches demonstrate comparable efficacy, with unique adverse event profiles. Single incision slings were introduced to minimize the complication of groin pain with full-length transobturator slings and enhance operative recovery. The earliest therapies for stress urinary incontinence including urethral bulking, retropubic colposuspension, and autologous sling offer alternative methods of surgical management without using synthetic mesh. These methods boast satisfactory efficacy with low rates of complications, and may be ideal for appropriately selected patients.

Keywords: Colposuspension; Fascial sling; Sling; Stress urinary incontinence; Urethral bulking.

PubMed Disclaimer