Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;30(3):284-294.
doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

Harmonization of Four Delirium Instruments: Creating Crosswalks and the Delirium Item-Bank (DEL-IB)

Affiliations

Harmonization of Four Delirium Instruments: Creating Crosswalks and the Delirium Item-Bank (DEL-IB)

Benjamin K I Helfand et al. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: Over 30 instruments are in current, active use for delirium identification. In a recent systematic review, we recommended 4 commonly used and well-validated instruments for clinical and research use. The goal of this study is to harmonize the four instruments on the same metric using modern methods in psychometrics.

Design: Secondary data analysis from 3 studies, and a simulation study based on the observed data.

Setting: Hospitalized (non-ICU) adults over 65 years old in the United States, Ireland, and Belgium.

Participants: The total sample comprised 600 participants, contributing 1,623 assessments.

Measurements: Confusion Assessment Method (long-form and short-form), Delirium Observation Screening Scale, Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98) (total and severity scores), and Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale.

Results: Using item response theory, we linked scores across instruments, placing all four instruments and their separate scorings on the same metric (the propensity to delirium). Kappa statistics comparing agreement in delirium identification among the instruments ranged from 0.37 to 0.75, with the highest agreement between the DRS-R-98 total score and MDAS. After linking scores, we created a harmonized item bank, called the Delirium Item Bank (DEL-IB), consisting of 50 items. The DEL-IB allowed us to create six crosswalks, to allow scores to be translated across instruments.

Conclusions: With our results, individual instrument scores can be directly compared to aid in clinical decision-making, and quantitatively combined in meta-analyses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Expected score characteristic curves of each delirium identification instrument. CAM: Confusion Assessment Method; DOSS: Delirium Observation Screening Scale; DRS-R-98: Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98; MDAS: Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Reliability of each delirium identification instrument. CAM: Confusion Assessment Method; DOSS: Delirium Observation Screening Scale; DRS-R-98: Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98; MDAS: Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale.

Comment in

  • Is It a Time to Harmonize Delirium Assessment?
    Lee S. Lee S. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;30(3):295-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2021.08.004. Epub 2021 Aug 14. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 34497015 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. MacLullich AM, Hall RJ: Who Understands Delirium? Oxford University Press, 2011 - PubMed
    1. Oh ES, Fong TG, Hshieh TT, et al.: Delirium in older persons: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA 2017; 318:1161–1174 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Witlox J, Eurelings LS, de Jonghe JF, et al.: Delirium in elderly patients and the risk of postdischarge mortality, institutionalization, and dementia: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2010; 304:443–451 - PubMed
    1. Marcantonio ER: Delirium in hospitalized older adults. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:1456–1466 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Charpentier PA, et al.: A multicomponent intervention to prevent delirium in hospitalized older patients. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:669–676 - PubMed

Publication types