Medical and Surgical Management of Left Ventricular Assist Device-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage
- PMID: 34418673
- PMCID: PMC8511228
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106053
Medical and Surgical Management of Left Ventricular Assist Device-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage
Abstract
Objectives: Management of left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is complicated by the competing concerns of hematoma expansion and the risk of thrombosis. Strategies include reversal or withholding of anticoagulation (AC) and neurosurgical (NSG) interventions. The consequences of these decisions can significantly impact both short- and long-term survival. Currently no guidelines exist. We reviewed medical and NSG practices following LVAD-associated ICH and analyzed outcomes.
Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of data collected between 2012-2018 was performed. Survival probability following ICH was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: Out of 283 patients, 32 (11%) had 34 ICHs: 16 intraparenchymal (IPH, 47%), 4 subdural (SDH, 12%), and 14 subarachnoid (SAH, 41%). IPH tended to occur sooner (median 138 [IQR 48 - 258] days post-LVAD placement) and be more neurologically devastating (mean GCS 11.4 [4.4]). Antithrombotics were reversed in 27 (79%); 1 thrombotic event occurred while off AC. Following resumption, re-hemorrhage occurred in 7 (25%), a median of 13 days (IQR 8-30) post-ICH. Five underwent NSG intervention and 6 (18%) went on to receive heart transplant. Overall, 30-day mortality was 26% (38% in IPH, 0% in SDH, and 29% in SAH), but rose to 44% at 6 months.
Conclusion: ICH is a common post-LVAD complication with high short- and long-term mortality, though ICH subtypes may not be equally devastating. Despite this, some may benefit from neurosurgical intervention and do well following cardiac transplant. Anticoagulation is frequently reversed after ICH. Resumption however should be approached cautiously in patients with LVADs given their possible baseline coagulopathy.
Keywords: Anticoagulation; Heart failure; Intracranial hemorrhage; Left ventricular assist device; Neurosurgery; Stroke; Thrombosis.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures



References
-
- Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the ACC/AHA Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. J Card Fail. 2017. August; 23(8):628–651. - PubMed
-
- Ahmed MM, Rahman M, Neal D, Aranda JM Jr, Klodell CT. Ventricular Assist Device Patients Have Different Clinical Outcomes and Altered Patterns of Bleeding with Intracranial Hemorrhage. ASAIO J. 2018. Jul-Aug; 64(4):e55–e60. - PubMed
-
- Spanier T, Oz M, Levin H, et al. Activation of coagulation and fibrinolytic pathways in patients with left ventricular assist devices. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996. October; 112(4):1090–7. - PubMed
-
- Slaughter MS. Hematologic Effects of Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices. J. of Cardiovasc. Trans. Res 2010; 3: 618–624. - PubMed
-
- Achneck HE, Sileshi B, Parikh A, Milano CA, Welsby IJ, Lawson JH. Pathophysiology of bleeding and clotting in the cardiac surgery patient: from vascular endothelium to circulatory assist device surface. Circulation. 2010. November 16; 122(20):2068–77. - PubMed