Tibial alignment following intramedullary nailing via three approaches
- PMID: 34420095
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03101-1
Tibial alignment following intramedullary nailing via three approaches
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of malalignment in patients undergoing IMN for tibial shaft fractures treated with the extra-articular lateral parapatellar, suprapatellar, and infrapatellar approaches.
Methods: A retrospective review of an institutional trauma database was completed at a single level 1 trauma academic medical centre. Quality of reduction was assessed using the following three parameters: (1) < 10°of angulation in orthogonal radiographic views (2) < 5 mm of displacement between the major fracture fragments (3) < 5 mm of gap between the major fracture fragments. A good reduction was one that met all 3 criteria, an acceptable reduction met 2 criteria, and a bad reduction met one or none of the criteria. All patients treated consecutively for tibial shaft fractures between June 1, 2019 and June 1, 2020 were identified. The final cohort included 57 tibia fractures in 56 patients. Of the 57 tibia fractures, 8 (14%) were proximal third, 32 (56%) were middle third, and 17 (30%) were distal third fractures.
Results: We found no significant difference in angulation, displacement, or gapping with respect to surgical approach utilized or location of fracture (proximal or distal tibia fractures) on one-way ANOVA. Quality of reduction was rated as "good" in 48 (84%) of the cases (19 supra, 13 infra, and 16 lateral). Nine reductions (16%) met only two of the three reduction quality criteria and were considered acceptable reductions. These included 2 suprapatellar (1 > 5 mm displacement, 1 > 5 mm gapping), 4 infrapatellar (4 > 5 mm displacement), and 3 lateral extra-articular parapatellar (2 > 5 mm displacement and 1 > 5 mm gapping). No reductions were determined to be bad according the Baumgaertner et al. criteria. There was no significant difference in the rate of combined fibula fractures or the rate of fibular fixation between the three cohorts.
Conclusions: In conclusion, no significant difference was found in fracture reduction angulation, displacement, and gapping in patients treated with an IMN with respect to approach for diaphyseal or metadiaphyseal tibial shaft fractures.
Keywords: Alignment; Approach; IRB approval date: 6/24/2020 retrospectively registered; IRB approval number: IRB20-0998; Intramedullary nailing; Tibia fracture.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J (1995) The epidemiology of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:417–421 - DOI
-
- Sanders RW, DiPasquale TG, Jordan CJ, Arrington JA, Sagi HC (2014) Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach: radiographic results and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 months follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 28(Suppl 8):S29-39 - DOI
-
- Stella M, Santolini E, Felli L, Santolini F, Horwitz DS (2019) Semiextended tibial nail insertion using an extraarticular lateral parapatellar approach: a 24-month follow-up prospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma 33:e366–e371 - DOI
-
- Wennergren D, Bergdahl C, Ekelund J, Juto H, Sundfeldt M, Moller M (2018) Epidemiology and incidence of tibia fractures in the Swedish fracture register. Injury 49:2068–2074 - DOI
-
- Bone LB, Johnson KD (1986) Treatment of tibial fractures by reaming and intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:877–887 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous