Combining Bone Collagen Matrix with hUC-MSCs for Application to Alveolar Process Cleft in a Rabbit Model
- PMID: 34420159
- DOI: 10.1007/s12015-021-10221-y
Combining Bone Collagen Matrix with hUC-MSCs for Application to Alveolar Process Cleft in a Rabbit Model
Abstract
Background: Most materials used clinically for filling severe bone defects either cannot induce bone re-generation or exhibit low bone conversion, therefore, their therapeutic effects are limited. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) exhibit good osteoinduction. However, the mechanism by which combining a heterogeneous bone collagen matrix with hUC-MSCs to repair the bone defects of alveolar process clefts remains unclear.
Methods: A rabbit alveolar process cleft model was established by removing the bone tissue from the left maxillary bone. Forty-eight young Japanese white rabbits (JWRs) were divided into normal, control, material and MSCs groups. An equal volume of a bone collagen matrix alone or combined with hUC-MSCs was implanted in the defect. X-ray, micro-focus computerized tomography (micro-CT), blood analysis, histochemical staining and TUNEL were used to detect the newly formed bone in the defect area at 3 and 6 months after the surgery.
Results: The bone formation rate obtained from the skull tissue in MSCs group was significantly higher than that in control group at 3 months (P < 0.01) and 6 months (P < 0.05) after the surgery. The apoptosis rate in the MSCs group was significantly higher at 3 months after the surgery (P < 0.05) and lower at 6 months after the surgery (P < 0.01) than those in the normal group.
Conclusions: Combining bone collagen matrix with hUC-MSCs promoted the new bone regeneration in the rabbit alveolar process cleft model through promoting osteoblasts formations and chondrocyte growth, and inducing type I collagen formation and BMP-2 generation.
Keywords: Alveolar process cleft; Bone collagen matrix; Micro-CT; Young rabbit; hUC-MSCs.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Cohen, M., Figueroa, A. A., Haviv, Y., Schafer, M. E., & Aduss, H. (1991). Iliac versus cranial bone for secondary grafting of residual alveolar clefts. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 87(3), 423–427.
-
- Tai, C. C., Sutherland, I. S., & McFadden, L. (2000). Prospective analysis of secondary alveolar bone grafting using computed tomography. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 58(11), 1241–1249.
-
- LaRossa, D., Buchman, S., Rothkopf, D. M., Mayro, R., & Randall, P. (1995). A comparison of iliac and cranial bone in secondary grafting of alveolar clefts. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 96(4), 789–797.
-
- Rosenthal, R. K., Folkman, J., & Glowacki, J. (1999). Demineralized bone implants for nonunion fracture, bone cysts, and fibous lesins. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 364, 61–69.
-
- Al-Asfour, A., Farzad, P., Andersson, L., Joseph, B., & Dahlin, C. (2014). Host tissue reactions of non-demineralized autogenic and xenogenic dentin blocks implanted in a non-osteogenic environment. An experimental study in rabbits. Dental Traumatology, 30(3), 198–203.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources