Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Oct 11;376(1835):20200334.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0334. Epub 2021 Aug 23.

Multilevel rhythms in multimodal communication

Affiliations
Review

Multilevel rhythms in multimodal communication

Wim Pouw et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

It is now widely accepted that the brunt of animal communication is conducted via several modalities, e.g. acoustic and visual, either simultaneously or sequentially. This is a laudable multimodal turn relative to traditional accounts of temporal aspects of animal communication which have focused on a single modality at a time. However, the fields that are currently contributing to the study of multimodal communication are highly varied, and still largely disconnected given their sole focus on a particular level of description or their particular concern with human or non-human animals. Here, we provide an integrative overview of converging findings that show how multimodal processes occurring at neural, bodily, as well as social interactional levels each contribute uniquely to the complex rhythms that characterize communication in human and non-human animals. Though we address findings for each of these levels independently, we conclude that the most important challenge in this field is to identify how processes at these different levels connect. This article is part of the theme issue 'Synchrony and rhythm interaction: from the brain to behavioural ecology'.

Keywords: cross-species; interaction; multimodal communication; multimodal signalling; rhythm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Multilevel rhythm in multimodal communication. Graphical overview of how each level contributes uniquely to the rhythms sustained in multimodal communication. Figures are adapted from [6,7] and inspired by Gilbert Gottlieb's (1929–2006) view on epigenesis.

References

    1. Partan SR, Marler P. 2005. Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals. Am. Nat. 166, 231-245. (10.1086/431246) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fröhlich M, Sievers C, Townsend SW, Gruber T, van Schaik CP. 2019. Multimodal communication and language origins: integrating gestures and vocalizations. Biol. Rev. 94, 1809-1829. (10.1111/brv.12535) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holler J, Levinson SC. 2019. Multimodal language processing in human communication. Trends Cogn. Sci. 23, 639-652. (10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stein BE, Stanford TR. 2008. Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 255-266. (10.1038/nrn2331) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hebets EA, Papaj DR. 2005. Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57, 197-214. (10.1007/s00265-004-0865-7) - DOI

Publication types