A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers
- PMID: 34421155
- PMCID: PMC8370857
- DOI: 10.1007/s11192-021-04118-3
A credit-like rating system to determine the legitimacy of scientific journals and publishers
Abstract
The predatory nature of a journal is in constant debate because it depends on multiple factors, which keep evolving. The classification of a journal as being predatory, or not, is no longer exclusively associated with its open access status, by inclusion or exclusion on perceived reputable academic indexes and/or on whitelists or blacklists. Inclusion in the latter may itself be determined by a host of criteria, may be riddled with type I errors (e.g., erroneous inclusion of a truly predatory journal in a whitelist) and/or type II errors (e.g., erroneous exclusion of a truly valid scholarly journal in a whitelist). While extreme cases of predatory publishing behavior may be clear cut, with true predatory journals displaying ample predatory properties, journals in non-binary grey zones of predatory criteria are difficult to classify. They may have some legitimate properties, but also some illegitimate ones. In such cases, it might be too extreme to refer to such entities as "predatory". Simply referring to them as "potentially predatory" or "borderline predatory" also does little justice to discern a predatory entity from an unscholarly, low-quality, unprofessional, or exploitative one. Faced with the limitations caused by this gradient of predatory dimensionality, this paper introduces a novel credit-like rating system, based in part on well-known financial credit ratings companies used to assess investment risk and creditworthiness, to assess journal or publisher quality. Cognizant of the weaknesses and criticisms of these rating systems, we suggest their use as a new way to view the scholarly nature of a journal or publisher. When used as a tool to supplement, replace, or reinforce current sets of criteria used for whitelists and blacklists, this system may provide a fresh perspective to gain a better understanding of predatory publishing behavior. Our tool does not propose to offer a definitive solution to this problem.
Keywords: Predatory publishing; Academic publishing; Exploitative versus predatory behavior; Journal and publisher whitelists and blacklists; Legitimate journals and publishers; Predatory criteria; Scholarly versus unscholarly behavior; Type I and II errors.
© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2021, corrected publication 2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestDD is an Associate Editor for Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry (https://www.springerpub.com/ethical-human-psychology-and-psychiatry.html), Consulting Editor for Social Work (https://academic.oup.com/sw), and an Editorial Board Member for Research on Social Work Practice (https://journals.sagepub.com/home/rsw), Social Work in Mental Health (https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/wsmh20/current), and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (https://www.springer.com/journal/10803). MM is a Managing Editor for International Journal of Health Policy and Management (https://www.ijhpm.com/). Other than these, the authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Blacklists and Whitelists To Tackle Predatory Publishing: a Cross-Sectional Comparison and Thematic Analysis.mBio. 2019 Jun 4;10(3):e00411-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00411-19. mBio. 2019. PMID: 31164459 Free PMC article.
-
Avoiding predatory publishing for early career neurosurgeons: what should you know before you submit?Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Jan;163(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04546-9. Epub 2020 Aug 26. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021. PMID: 32845360 Review.
-
An artificial intelligence tool misclassifies sport science journals as predatory.J Sci Med Sport. 2024 Apr;27(4):266-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2023.12.006. Epub 2023 Dec 20. J Sci Med Sport. 2024. PMID: 38158321
-
An open automation system for predatory journal detection.Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 20;13(1):2976. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30176-z. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36806308 Free PMC article.
-
Publishing in black and white: the relevance of listing of scientific journals.Rheumatol Int. 2017 Nov;37(11):1773-1778. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3830-2. Epub 2017 Oct 5. Rheumatol Int. 2017. PMID: 28983732 Review.
Cited by
-
Junk Science, Junk Journals, and Junk Publishing Management: Risk to Science's Credibility.Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2022 Nov 22:1-4. doi: 10.1007/s11406-022-00590-0. Online ahead of print. Philosophia (Ramat Gan). 2022. PMID: 36467392 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Does the disconnect between the peer-reviewed label and reality explain the peer review crisis, and can open peer review or preprints resolve it? A narrative review.Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 14. doi: 10.1007/s00210-025-04486-0. Online ahead of print. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025. PMID: 40810796 Review.
-
Progressive and degenerative journals: on the growth and appraisal of knowledge in scholarly publishing.Eur J Philos Sci. 2022;12(4):61. doi: 10.1007/s13194-022-00492-8. Epub 2022 Nov 9. Eur J Philos Sci. 2022. PMID: 36407486 Free PMC article.
References
-
- ABDC (Australian Business Deans Council). (2018). 2018 Journal Quality List Methodology Review. https://abdc.edu.au/research/abdc-journal-quality-list/2018-journal-qual... (last accessed: June 4, 2021).
-
- Afonso A, Gomes P, Rother P. Short-and long-run determinants of sovereign debt credit ratings. International Journal of Finance and Economics. 2011;16(1):1–15. doi: 10.1002/ijfe.416. - DOI
-
- Asimakopoulos P, Asimakopoulos S. A tale of two tails: Cross credit ratings and cash holdings. SSRN Preprint (not Peer Reviewed) 2018 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3291498. - DOI
-
- Asimakopoulos P, Asimakopoulos S, Zhang A. Dividend smoothing and credit rating changes. The European Journal of Finance. 2021;27(1–2):62–85. doi: 10.1080/1351847X.2020.1739101. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources