Host Genetics of Response to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome in Sows: Reproductive Performance
- PMID: 34422010
- PMCID: PMC8371709
- DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.707870
Host Genetics of Response to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome in Sows: Reproductive Performance
Abstract
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) is historically the most economically important swine disease worldwide that severely affects the reproductive performance of sows. However, little is still known about the genetic basis of reproductive performance in purebred herds during a PRRS outbreak through the comparison of maternal and terminal breeds. Thus, the objective of this work was to explore the host genetics of response to PRRS in purebred sows from two breeds. Reproductive data included 2546 Duroc and 2522 Landrace litters from 894 and 813 purebred sows, respectively, which had high-density genotype data available (29,799 single nucleotide polymorphisms; SNPs). The data were split into pre-PRRS, PRRS, and post-PRRS phases based on standardized farrow-year-week estimates. Heritability estimates for reproductive traits were low to moderate (≤0.20) for Duroc and Landrace across PRRS phases. On the other hand, genetic correlations of reproductive traits between PRRS phases were overall moderate to high for both breeds. Several associations between MARC0034894, a candidate SNP for response to PRRS, with reproductive performance were identified (P-value < 0.05). Genomic analyses detected few QTL for reproductive performance across all phases, most explaining a small percentage of the additive genetic variance (≤8.2%, averaging 2.1%), indicating that these traits are highly polygenic. None of the identified QTL within a breed and trait overlapped between PRRS phases. Overall, our results indicate that Duroc sows are phenotypically more resilient to PRRS than Landrace sows, with a similar return to PRRS-free performance between breeds for most reproductive traits. Genomic prediction results indicate that genomic selection for improved reproductive performance under a PRRS outbreak is possible, especially in Landrace sows, by training markers using data from PRRS-challenged sows. On the other hand, the high genetic correlations with reproductive traits between PRRS phases suggest that selection for improved reproductive performance in a clean environment could improve performance during PRRS, but with limited efficiency due to their low heritability estimates. Thus, we hypothesize that an indicator trait that could be indirectly selected to increase the response to selection for these traits would be desirable and would also improve the reproductive performance of sows during a PRRS outbreak.
Keywords: GWAS; PRRS; QTL; SNP; disease outbreak; genomics; reproduction; swine.
Copyright © 2021 Hickmann, Braccini Neto, Kramer, Huang, Gray, Dekkers, Sanglard and Serão.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that this study received funding from Smithfield Premium Genetics, NC, United States. The funder had the following involvement with the study: providing performance and genotype data and collection of blood samples. In addition, YH and KG are employed by the company Smithfield Premium Genetics, NC, United States. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Host Genetics of Response to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome in Sows: Antibody Response as an Indicator Trait for Improved Reproductive Performance.Front Genet. 2021 Aug 4;12:707873. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.707873. eCollection 2021. Front Genet. 2021. PMID: 34422011 Free PMC article.
-
Genetic analysis of reproductive traits and antibody response in a PRRS outbreak herd.J Anim Sci. 2014 Jul;92(7):2905-21. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7821. Epub 2014 May 30. J Anim Sci. 2014. PMID: 24879764
-
Genomics of response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in purebred and crossbred sows: antibody response and performance following natural infection vs. vaccination.J Anim Sci. 2021 May 1;99(5):skab097. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab097. J Anim Sci. 2021. PMID: 33782709 Free PMC article.
-
Host genetics of response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome in nursery pigs.Vet Microbiol. 2017 Sep;209:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.03.026. Epub 2017 Mar 22. Vet Microbiol. 2017. PMID: 28385270 Review.
-
Genetic control of host resistance to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infection.Virus Res. 2010 Dec;154(1-2):161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Aug 13. Virus Res. 2010. PMID: 20709118 Review.
Cited by
-
Enhanced Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Replication in Nsp4- or Nsp2-Overexpressed Marc-145 Cell Lines.Vet Sci. 2025 Jan 13;12(1):52. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12010052. Vet Sci. 2025. PMID: 39852927 Free PMC article.
-
Host Genetics of Response to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome in Sows: Antibody Response as an Indicator Trait for Improved Reproductive Performance.Front Genet. 2021 Aug 4;12:707873. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.707873. eCollection 2021. Front Genet. 2021. PMID: 34422011 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B. M., Walker S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
-
- Bishop S. C., Axford R. F. E., Nicholas F. W., Owen J. B. (2010). Breeding for Disease Resistance in Farm Animals, 3rd Edn. Wallingford: CAB International.
-
- Boddicker N. J., Bjorkquist A., Rowland R. R., Lunney J. K., Reecy J. M., Dekkers J. C. M. (2014a). Genome-wide association and genomic prediction for host response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection. Genet. Sel. Evol. 46:18. 10.1186/1297-9686-46-18 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources