Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;58(1):8-15.
doi: 10.1111/jpc.15703. Epub 2021 Aug 23.

Paediatric genomic testing: Navigating genomic reports for the general paediatrician

Affiliations

Paediatric genomic testing: Navigating genomic reports for the general paediatrician

Margit Shah et al. J Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Monogenic rare disorders contribute significantly to paediatric morbidity and mortality, and elucidation of the underlying genetic cause may have benefits for patients, families and clinicians. Advances in genomic technology have enabled diagnostic yields of up to 50% in some paediatric cohorts. This has led to an increase in the uptake of genetic testing across paediatric disciplines. This can place an increased burden on paediatricians, who may now be responsible for interpreting and explaining test results to patients. However, genomic results can be complex, and sometimes inconclusive for the ordering paediatrician. Results may also cause uncertainty and anxiety for patients and their families. The paediatrician's genetic literacy and knowledge of genetic principles are therefore critical to inform discussions with families and guide ongoing patient care. Here, we present four hypothetical case vignettes where genomic testing is undertaken, and discuss possible results and their implications for paediatricians and families. We also provide a list of key terms for paediatricians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Possible results of genomic testing. For variants of uncertain significance, the additional clinical/genetic correlation provided in expert multidisciplinary team review meetings provides the paediatrician with additional pathways for interpreting the variant, and possibly reclassifying as pathogenic or benign. Examples of these scenarios are provided in this paper (Adapted from Sachdev et al., with permission).

References

    1. Stark Z, Tan TY, Chong B et al. A prospective evaluation of whole‐exome sequencing as a first‐tier molecular test in infants with suspected monogenic disorders. Genet. Med. 2016; 18: 1090–6. - PubMed
    1. Vissers LELM, van Nimwegen KJM, Schieving JH et al. A clinical utility study of exome sequencing versus conventional genetic testing in pediatric neurology. Genet. Med. 2017; 19: 1055–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yeung A, Tan NB, Tan TY et al. A cost‐effectiveness analysis of genomic sequencing in a prospective versus historical cohort of complex pediatric patients. Genet. Med. 2020; 22: 1986–93. - PubMed
    1. Palmer EE, Schofield D, Shrestha R et al. Integrating exome sequencing into a diagnostic pathway for epileptic encephalopathy: Evidence of clinical utility and cost effectiveness. Mol. Genet. Genomic Med. 2018; 6: 186–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Medicare Benefits Schedule . Category 6 Pathology Services 73358, 73359 and 73360 . Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2007. Available from: http://www9.health.gov.au/mbs/search.cfm?q=exome&Submit=&sopt=S [accessed 11 November 2020].