Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct:22:163-171.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.08.012. Epub 2021 Aug 21.

IL-36α/IL-36RA/IL-38 signaling mediates inflammation and barrier disruption in human corneal epithelial cells under hyperosmotic stress

Affiliations

IL-36α/IL-36RA/IL-38 signaling mediates inflammation and barrier disruption in human corneal epithelial cells under hyperosmotic stress

Jin-Miao Li et al. Ocul Surf. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the distinct expression and diverse roles of IL-36 cytokines in dry eye disease using an in vitro hyperosmolarity model of human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs).

Methods: Primary HCECs were cultured from fresh donor limbal explants. Hyperosmolarity model was established by switching HCECs from isosmotic (312 mOsM) to hyperosmotic medium (350-500 mOsM) alone or with addition of rhIL-36RA or rhIL-38 for 2-48 h. Some cultures were treated with IL-36α (1-10 ng/ml) with or without rhIL-36RA or rhIL-38. Gene expression was detected by RT-qPCR; and protein production and barrier disruption were evaluated by ELISA and/or immunofluorescent staining.

Results: IL-36 cytokines were differential expressed in primary HCECs. Among 3 pro-inflammatory agonists, IL-36α, but not IL-36β and IL-36γ, was distinctly induced at osmolarity-dependent manner while two antagonist IL-36RA and IL-38 were significantly suppressed in HCECs exposed to hyperosmotic stress. IL-36α increased to 4.4-fold in mRNA and 6.9-fold at protein levels (116.0 ± 36.33 pg/ml vs 16.79 ± 6.51 pg/ml in controls) by 450 mOsM, but dramatically inhibited by addition of rhIL-36RA or rhIL-38. Exogenous rhIL-36α stimulated expression of TNF-α and IL-1β at mRNA and protein levels and disrupted tight junction proteins ZO-1 and occludin. However, rhIL-36RA or rhIL-38 suppressed TNF-α and IL-1β production and protected HCECs from barrier disruption in response to IL-36α or hyperosmolarity.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that the stimulated pro-inflammatory IL-36α with the suppressed antagonists IL-36RA and IL-38 is a novel mechanism by which hyperosmolarity induces inflammation in dry eye. IL-36RA and IL-38 may have a therapeutic potential in dry eye.

Keywords: Barrier; Corneal epithelium; Dry eye; Hyperosmolarity; IL-36; IL-36RA; IL-38; Inflammation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Gene expression of IL-36 cytokines in human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs). Five of IL-36 cytokines, three proinflammatory agonists IL-36α, IL-36β, IL-36γ and two IL-36R antagonists IL-36RA and IL-38 were detected at different mRNA levels in HCECs based on the threshold cycle (Ct) value in real-time PCR with house-keeping gene GAPDH as an internal control. Data were summarized as mean ± SD from 10 separated experiments.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Differential responses of five IL-36 cytokines to hyperosmolarity in HCECs by RT-qPCR.
A. The time course of IL-36 family response to hyperosmolarity was performed in HCECs exposed to 450 mOsM medium for 2–14 h. IL-36α mRNA reached peak level at 4 h, while the expression of IL-36β and IL-36γ did not change in the period of 2–24 h. The mRNA levels of IL-36RA and IL-38 were suppressed with lowest levels at 4 h. B. The dose-response experiment showed that IL-36α mRNA increased osmolarity-dependently with peak level by 450 and 500 mOsM while the expression of IL-36RA and IL-38 decreased osmolarity-dependently with lowest levels by 450 mOsM medium. Data were summarized as mean ± SD from 5 separated experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, as compared with 312 mOsM; ^ P < 0.05, ^^ P < 0.01, as compared with 312 mOsM.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Negative regulation of rhIL-36RA and rhIL-38 on IL-36α production induced by hyperosmolarity. IL-36α expression increased by medium at 400-500 mOsM while significantly inhibited by rhIL-36RA and rhIL-38 at10-50 ng/ml, as evaluated by RT-qPCR for mRNA (A) and by ELISA for protein levels (B). Data were summarized as mean ± SD from 5 separated experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, as compared with 312 mOsM; ^ P < 0.05, ^^ P < 0.01, as compared with 450 mOsM.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
IL-36α stimulates the production of TNF-α and IL-1β in HCECs. A. B. TNF-α production increased dose-dependently by IL-36α (1, 5, 10 ng/ml) while suppressed by IL-36RA and IL-38 (10, 50 ng/ml), as evaluated at mRNA by RT-qPCR (A) and protein levels by ELISA (B). C. D. IL-1β production increased dose-dependently by IL-36α (1, 5, 10 ng/ml) while suppressed by IL-36RA and IL-38 (10, 50 ng/ml), as evaluated at mRNA by RT-QPCR (C) and protein levels by ELISA (D). Data were summarized as mean ± SD from 5 separated experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, as compared with 312 mOsM; ^ P < 0.05, ^^ P < 0.01, as compared with 450 mOsM.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
IL-36α/IL-36RA/IL-38 signaling mediated the production of TNF-α and IL-1β in HCECs under hyperosmotic stress. (A) mRNA and protein expression of TNF-α in hyperosmotic medium (400 and 450 mOsM) with 312 mOsM as control. IL-36RA and IL-38 suppressed the production of TNF-α. (B). IL-1β in hyperosmotic medium (400 and 450 mOsM) with 312 mOsM as control. IL-36RA and IL-38 suppressed the production of IL-1β. mRNA expression evaluated by RT-qPCR, protein levels by ELISA. Data were summarized as mean ± SD from 5 separated experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, as compared with 312 mOsM; ^ P < 0.05, ^^ P < 0.01, as compared with 450 mOsM.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.. Corneal epithelial barrier was disrupted by IL-36α but protected by IL-36RA and IL-38.
A. C. Representative images showed that IL-36α (10–50 ng/ml) dose-dependently disrupted corneal epithelial tight junction proteins ZO-1 (A) and occluding (C), which were largely restored by IL-36RA and IL-38 restored corneal barrier from disruption. B. D. The integrated or remaining areas of fluorescent stain per field were quantified as diagrams for ZO-1 (C) and occludin (D). Data were summarized as mean ± SD from 5 separated experiments. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, as compared with 312 mOsM.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.. IL-36α/IL-36RA/IL-38 signaling mediated the corneal epithelial barrier disruption by hyperosmolarity.
Representative images of immunofluoreseent staining showed that tight junction proteins ZO-1 (A) and occludin (C) were significantly disrupted by hyperosmotic medium at 450 mOsM, but largely restored by IL-36RA or IL-38 at 10 ng/ml. B. D. The integrated or remaining areas of fluorescent stain per field were quantified as diagrams for ZO-1 (C) and occludin (D). Data were summarized as mean ± SD from 5 separated experiments. **P < 0.01 as compared with 312 mOsM.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 8.. Negative regulation of rhIL-1RA on mRNA and production of IL-36α induced by hyperosmolarity.
IL-36α expression increased by medium at 450 mOsM while partially inhibited by rhIL-1RA at10-50 ng/ml, as evaluated by RT-qPCR for mRNA (A) and by ELISA for protein levels (B). IL-1β expression increased by 450 mOsM while largely inhibited by rhIL-1RA at10-50 ng/ml, as evaluated by RT-qPCR for mRNA (C) and by ELISA for protein levels (D). Data were summarized as mean ± SD from 5 separated experiments. **P < 0.01, as compared with 312 mOsM; ^ P < 0.05, ^^ P < 0.01, as compared with 450 mOsM.

References

    1. Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, et al. Tfos dews ii definition and classification report. Ocul Surf 2017;15:276–83. - PubMed
    1. Stapleton F, Alves M, Bunya VY, Jalbert I, Lekhanont K, Malet F, et al. Tfos dews ii epidemiology report. Ocul Surf 2017;15:334–65. - PubMed
    1. Bron AJ, de Paiva CS, Chauhan SK, Bonini S, Gabison EE, Jain S, et al. Tfos dews ii pathophysiology report. Ocul Surf 2017;15:438–510. - PubMed
    1. Lam H, Bleiden L, de Paiva CS, Farley W, Stern ME, Pflugfelder SC. Tear cytokine profiles in dysfunctional tear syndrome. AmJOphthalmol 2009:147:198–205. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoon KC, Park CS, You IC, Choi HJ, Lee KH, Im SK, et al. Expression of cxcl9, −10, −11, and cxcr3 in the tear film and ocular surface of patients with dry eye syndrome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:643–50. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types