Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Jun 26;7(3):236-239.
doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.04.007. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Systematic and other reviews: Criteria and complexities

Affiliations
Editorial

Systematic and other reviews: Criteria and complexities

Robert T Sataloff et al. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Grant M.J., Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26:91–108. - PubMed
    1. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Plos Med. 2009;6:e1000097. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moher D., Cook D.J., Eastwood S., Olkin I., Rennie D., Stroup D.F. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–1900. - PubMed
    1. Green S., Higgins J. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2005. Glossary. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5.https://training.cochrane.org/handbook Available at:
    1. PRISMA 2009 Checklist. http://prisma-statement.org/documents/PRISMA%202009%20checklist.pdf PRISMA-Statement.org.

Publication types