Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep;41(5):1134-1143.
doi: 10.1111/opo.12854.

Eye movement patterns and reading ability in children

Gregory P Hindmarsh  1 , Alex A Black  1 , Sonia Lj White  2 , Shelley Hopkins  1 , Joanne M Wood  1
Affiliations

Eye movement patterns and reading ability in children

Gregory P Hindmarsh et al. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: Eye movements are integral to the reading process. This study characterised the eye movement patterns of children differentiated by their reading ability, while completing a saccadic eye movement test with irregular target spacing (Development Eye Movement (DEM) test) using a novel eye movement classification algorithm.

Methods: Participants included 196 Grade 2 Australian schoolchildren (mean age: 7.9 ± 0.3 years) who completed a computerised version of the DEM test, while their eye movements were recorded (Tobii TX300 eye-tracker). Children also completed a standardised reading comprehension test, which categorised them into below average and average or above reading ability groups. A novel eye movement classification algorithm was developed that considered the vertical and horizontal eye movements of each child.

Results: Compared to children with average or above reading ability, the below average reading group displayed poor vertical eye movement control, demonstrated by a significantly greater proportion of interline eye movements (vertical eye movements away from the current line) (p < 0.001). Differences in horizontal eye movements were also observed, with below average readers demonstrating a smaller proportion of expected forward saccades (p < 0.001) (within-line forward saccades with horizontal amplitude between the minimum and maximum horizontal spacing between digits), while this group also displayed longer fixation durations (p = 0.001). The below average reading group demonstrated significantly poorer results on all standard DEM metrics than the average or above reading ability group: horizontal subtest time (p < 0.001), vertical subtest time (p = 0.004) and ratio (p = 0.004).

Conclusions: Children exhibiting below average reading ability were poorer at maintaining control of vertical (interline), as well as horizontal, eye movements compared to children with average or above reading ability. Future studies should explore the mechanisms underlying these differences, particularly in vertical eye movements, given that reading paragraphs (involving multiple lines of text) requires accurate eye movements in both the vertical and horizontal direction.

Keywords: Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) test; eye movements; reading ability; visual attention; visual information processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Hernandez D. Double jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation; 2011.
    1. Rayner K. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Q J Exp Psychol. 2009;62:1457-1506.
    1. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull. 1998;124:372-422.
    1. Rayner K, Liversedge S. Linguistic and cognitive influences on eye movements during reading. In: Liversedge S, Gilchrist I, Everling S, editors. The Oxford handbook of eye movements. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 751-766.
    1. Lefton L, Nagle R, Johnson G, Fisher D. Eye movement dynamics of good and poor readers: Then and now. J Read Behav. 1979;11:319-328.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources