Effect of continuous positive airway pressure associated to exercise on the breathing pattern and heart rate variability of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 34431871
- PMCID: PMC8389609
- DOI: 10.1590/1414-431X2021e10974
Effect of continuous positive airway pressure associated to exercise on the breathing pattern and heart rate variability of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) has been used to improve gas exchange and diaphragmatic function, among others benefits. Moreover, it can be used to increase exercise tolerance and positively influence ventilatory function and breathing pattern (BP) during exercise. However, there is no information about the long-term effects of CPAP, as an adjunct to an inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program, on BP and heart rate variability (HRV) of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG). Twenty patients were allocated to receive, after randomization, standard inpatient CR without CPAP (control group - CG) or CR with CPAP between 10 to 12 cmH2O (CPAP group - CPG) associated with the exercises. Participants were assessed preoperatively and on the discharge day, in the sitting rest position. Outcome measurements included BP variables, collected by respiratory inductive plethysmography, and HRV, collected by polar precision performance. The CPG presented lower values of percent rib cage inspiratory and expiratory contributions to tidal volume (%RCi and %RCe) at discharge time, compared to CG. No statistical differences between groups were observed for HRV variables and both groups presented lower values of these indices, compared to preoperative ones. In this context, the patients who received CPAP throughout the whole rehabilitation program were discharged with a better BP, which could indicate more synchronized breathing. CPAP did not influence cardiac autonomic modulation in the long term.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Effects of different levels of positive airway pressure on breathing pattern and heart rate variability after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.Braz J Med Biol Res. 2011 Jan;44(1):38-45. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2010007500129. Epub 2010 Nov 19. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2011. PMID: 21085891 Clinical Trial.
-
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure During Exercise Improves Walking Time in Patients Undergoing Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2016 Jan-Feb;36(1):20-7. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000144. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2016. PMID: 26468628 Clinical Trial.
-
Recovery of linear and nonlinear heart rate dynamics after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014 Nov;34(6):449-56. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12115. Epub 2013 Dec 26. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014. PMID: 24666784 Clinical Trial.
-
Combined Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Cycle Ergometer in Early Rehabilitation of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Patients.J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023 Aug;33(8):866-871. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2023.08.866. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023. PMID: 37553924
-
[Augmented spontaneous breathing].Anaesthesist. 1996 Sep;45(9):839-55. doi: 10.1007/s001010050319. Anaesthesist. 1996. PMID: 8967603 Review. German.
References
-
- Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;124:2610–2642. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823b5fee. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sá MPBO, Perazzo ÁM, Saragiotto FAS, Cavalcanti LRP, Almeida ACE, Neto, Campos JCS, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery improves survival without increasing the risk of stroke in patients with ischemic heart failure in comparison to percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis with 54,173 patients. Braz J Cadiovasc Surg. 2019;34:396–405. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0170. - DOI - PMC - PubMed