Comparison of Acute and Chronic Surgical Complications Following Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Traditional Open Radical Prostatectomy Among Men in Taiwan
- PMID: 34432012
- PMCID: PMC8387846
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20156
Comparison of Acute and Chronic Surgical Complications Following Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Traditional Open Radical Prostatectomy Among Men in Taiwan
Abstract
Importance: Few studies have evaluated long-term surgical complications in patients with prostate cancer (PC) who receive open radical prostatectomy (ORP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Objective: To examine the perioperative and postoperative surgical complications among patients with PC who underwent ORP, LRP, or RARP.
Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study included patients who received a diagnosis of resectable PC and underwent RP between January 1 and December 31, 2015. Participants were enrolled in the Taiwan Cancer Registry. The index date was the date of surgery, and the follow-up duration was the period from the index date to December 31, 2018. Data analysis was performed in September 2020.
Exposures: ORP, LRP, or RARP.
Main outcomes and measures: Two multivariate mixed models accounting for hospital clusters were fitted to ascertain the association of RARP with treatment outcomes (ie, hospital stay, blood transfusion, postoperative pain, erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, and hernia); general linear regression models were used for continuous outcomes, the amount of blood transfused, and hospital stay, and logistic regression models were used for analyzing postoperative outcomes and surgical complications.
Results: Of the 1407 patients included in this study, 315 (22.4%) received ORP (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [6.8] years), 276 (19.6%) received LRP (mean [SD] age, 66.8 [6.4] years), and 816 (58.0%) received RARP (mean [SD] age, 66.1 [6.7] years). Mean (SD) follow-up in the full cohort was 36.7 (4.6) months. No statistically significant differences were observed in age, clinical tumor stage, pathological tumor stage, Gleason score, Gleason grade group, preoperative prostate-specific antigen concentration, D'Amico risk classification, and hospital level. A shorter hospital stay was observed for patients undergoing RARP vs those undergoing ORP (mean [SE] difference, -1.64 [0.22] days; P < .001) and LRP (mean [SE] difference, -0.57 [0.23] days; P = .01). Patients undergoing RARP had lower odds of receiving a blood transfusion (RARP vs ORP: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.25; 95% CI, 0.17-0.36; RARP vs LRP: aOR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.91). For postoperative pain, RARP was associated with a decrease in the odds of moderate to severe postoperative pain for as long as 12 weeks compared with both ORP and LRP (eg, RARP vs LRP at week 12: aOR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.85; P = .02). The aORs for RARP vs those for ORP and LRP in the third year after RP were, for erectile dysfunction, 0.74 (95% CI, 0.45-0.92) and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.36-0.98), respectively; for urinary incontinence, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.65-0.99) and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.42-0.86), respectively; and for hernia, 0.51 (95% CI, 0.31-0.84) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.46-0.92), respectively.
Conclusions and relevance: In this study, undergoing RARP was associated with fewer acute and chronic postoperative complications than undergoing ORP or LRP.
Conflict of interest statement
Comment in
-
Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Prostatectomy-Is the Jury Still Out?JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2120693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20693. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34432015 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted vs open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a Cochrane systematic review.BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):845-853. doi: 10.1111/bju.14062. Epub 2017 Nov 17. BJU Int. 2018. PMID: 29063728
-
Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):679-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.027. Epub 2011 Dec 22. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22206800
-
Patterns-of-care and health economic analysis of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in the Australian public health system.BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):930-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13317. Epub 2015 Oct 1. BJU Int. 2016. PMID: 26350758
-
Latest Comprehensive Medical Resource Consumption in Robot-Assisted versus Laparoscopic and Traditional Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 29;13(7):1564. doi: 10.3390/cancers13071564. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33805354 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted and laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy in clinically localized prostate cancer: perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes: A Systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 May;98(22):e15770. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015770. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31145297 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Risk of Pediatric Bipolar Disorder After General Anesthesia in Infants and Toddlers: A Propensity Score-Matched Population-Based Cohort Study.Schizophr Bull. 2024 Jul 27;50(4):784-791. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbae053. Schizophr Bull. 2024. PMID: 38641553 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Diabetes Severity and Mortality with Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 22;14(10):2553. doi: 10.3390/cancers14102553. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35626156 Free PMC article.
-
Developing and validating utility parameters to establish patient-reported outcome-based perioperative symptom management in patients undergoing prostatectomy: a multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study protocol.BMJ Open. 2023 Aug 8;13(8):e074763. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074763. BMJ Open. 2023. PMID: 37553190 Free PMC article.
-
Self-reported quality of recovery after radical prostatectomy-a prospective cohort study.Qual Life Res. 2025 Jul 18. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04026-6. Online ahead of print. Qual Life Res. 2025. PMID: 40679536
-
Ventral hernia repair with permanent mesh for non-Hispanic black versus white patients: access and post-operative outcomes in the era of robotic surgery.Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):560-567. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11252-5. Epub 2024 Oct 21. Surg Endosc. 2025. PMID: 39433584
References
-
- Health Promotion Administration . Taiwan Cancer Registry annual report. Accessed July 27, 2021. https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=119
-
- Chang SC, Chen HM, Wu SY. There are no differences in positive surgical margin rates or biochemical failure-free survival among patients receiving open, laparoscopic, or robotic radical prostatectomy: a nationwide cohort study from the National Cancer Database. Cancers (Basel). 2020;13(1):E106. doi:10.3390/cancers13010106 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous