Commentary on "Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis"
- PMID: 34432090
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04958-w
Commentary on "Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis"
Comment in
-
Authors' Reply: Commentary on "Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis".Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jan;33(1):165-166. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05000-9. Epub 2021 Nov 4. Int Urogynecol J. 2022. PMID: 34735590 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis.Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Aug;31(8):1497-1506. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04231-6. Epub 2020 Feb 15. Int Urogynecol J. 2020. PMID: 32062680
References
-
- Driusso P, Beleza ACS, Mira DM, et al. Are there differences in short-term pelvic floor muscle function after cesarean section or vaginal delivery in primiparous women? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(8):1497–506. - DOI
-
- Doi SA, Barendregt JJ, Khan S, Thalib L, Williams GM. Advances in the meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials I: The inverse variance heterogeneity model. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015;45(Pt A):130–8.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
